Hi!
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Due to a bug in the the condition, however, it redirected for all
methods unless they started with a / (reported as a bug in the
Zope mailing list).
I fixed the condition (patch to collector 1058).
Unfortunately, returning getattr(self,method)(self,REQUEST)
requires the
Hi,
I have a Python product which defines a __before_publishing_traverse_
method. At last I thought it would all work fine now...
Now I added one of my User Folder objects and got an exception because
__before_publishing_traverse__ was called with only two arguments
instead of three. Quite
Hiya everyone!
I didn't get any response on my last post, so I'm charging ahead full speed.
The fact that litmus complains about Zope's inability to accept UTF-8
filenames is something I view as a bug. It can be fixed simply by
changing the default _checkid() implementation to allow extended
This issue has been discussed several times in the past. There was a
consensus
not allow extended characters because of compatibility issues and
conformance of
the HTTP specs (which don't allow extended chars in URLs AFAIk in unencoded
form).
So it is your task to proof that your implementation
On Monday 20 October 2003 15:01, Lennart Regebro wrote:
The fact that litmus complains about Zope's inability to accept UTF-8
filenames is something I view as a bug.
does webdav specify how utf-8-encoded dav filenames correspond to file names
used in URLs?
Either the already existing, but
Hi all -
A quick reminder that we'll be having a bug day tomorrow
10/21 to try to knock out some remaining issues in the drive
to get a Zope 2.7 final out.
Hope to see you on #zope-bugday !
Brian Lloyd[EMAIL PROTECTED]
V.P. Engineering 540.361.1716
Zope Corporation
Andreas Jung wrote:
This issue has been discussed several times in the past.
Probably, but infortunately I can't find anything about it.
Toby Dickenson wrote:
On Monday 20 October 2003 15:01, Lennart Regebro wrote:
The fact that litmus complains about Zope's inability to accept UTF-8
filenames
I've started work on a new-style ExtensionClass. This is a port
of ExtensionClass to new-style classes. This will provide a number
of advantages:
- Use of new-style class features (e.g. descriptors) in Zope objects.
- Support for cyclic garbage collection.
- Ability to use new-style classes as
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 11:55:39AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
I've started work on a new-style ExtensionClass. This is a port
of ExtensionClass to new-style classes. This will provide a number
of advantages:
- Use of new-style class features (e.g. descriptors) in Zope objects.
woohoo!
this
Jim Fulton wrote at 2003-10-20 11:55 -0400:
...
Speaking of Zope 2.8, Jeremy Hylton has suggested that, perhaps, Zope 2.8
should be a release that provides *only*:
- New-style ExtensionClass, and
- ZODB 3.3, featuring multi-version concurrency control,
plus any features that
Tobias Herp wrote at 2003-10-20 15:15 +0200:
I have a Python product which defines a __before_publishing_traverse_
method. At last I thought it would all work fine now...
Now I added one of my User Folder objects and got an exception because
__before_publishing_traverse__ was called
Yuppie wrote at 2003-10-20 09:22 +0200:
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Due to a bug in the the condition, however, it redirected for all
methods unless they started with a / (reported as a bug in the
Zope mailing list).
I fixed the condition (patch to collector 1058).
Unfortunately,
I'm getting close to needing to roll out an upgrade for a client site
that will need to use python2.2 or . I have zope-2.6.2 working with
python2.2.3 but when I try and use python2.3.2 things don't go so well.
I'm wondering should I wait for 2.7 (and python2.3.2) or just go with
what I have.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 10:59:38AM -0400, Brian Lloyd wrote:
Hi all -
A quick reminder that we'll be having a bug day tomorrow
10/21 to try to knock out some remaining issues in the drive
to get a Zope 2.7 final out.
Hope to see you on #zope-bugday !
isn't it usually #zope-dev?
I'm getting close to needing to roll out an upgrade for a client site
that will need to use python2.2 or . I have zope-2.6.2 working with
python2.2.3 but when I try and use python2.3.2 things don't go so well.
I'm wondering should I wait for 2.7 (and python2.3.2) or just go with
what I
On segunda-feira, out 20, 2003, at 13:55 Brazil/East, Jim Fulton wrote:
Speaking of Zope 2.8, Jeremy Hylton has suggested that, perhaps, Zope
2.8
should be a release that provides *only*:
- New-style ExtensionClass, and
- ZODB 3.3, featuring multi-version concurrency control,
plus any
16 matches
Mail list logo