Hi Chris,
Sorry, do you mean the box where the Zope 2.9.1 distro was built or the
one where I was installing it?
The latter.
If the latter, how dowe fix Zope so it doesn't get tripped up by other
pywin32 distros on the same box?
If this is the problem, it will probably only happen when
Mark Hammond wrote:
If this is the problem, it will probably only happen when using
runzope.bat - running as a service probably works fine.
Ah, okay, yeah, I only use runzope...
In that case, the problem is the order that Windows uses to search for DLLs.
The short answer is that things
* that directory is on your PATH before the Windows SYSTEM32 directory
(which is where pywin32 sticks its copy of these files, for
various reasons)
Do both this and the above have to be true, or will things work if
either of them are true?
Either one has the end result of locating the
Andreas Jung wrote:
Zope 2.8 ships/shipped with Five 1.0 which is very old and no longer
actively maintained. Most ppl doing currently development with Zope
2.8 are using Five 1.2. Should we upgrade the Five version in Zope
2.8 to Five 1.2 to make their lives a bit easier? There is possibly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27 Mar 2006, at 11:55, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
Zope 2.8 ships/shipped with Five 1.0 which is very old and no longer
actively maintained. Most ppl doing currently development with Zope
2.8 are using Five 1.2. Should
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Withers wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
CMF or not - if one need such a functionality one can download CMF or
a related product. If such functionality should belong into the core
than it should be implemented in a reusable
+1
On 27. Mär 2006, at 07:35, Andreas Jung wrote:
Zope 2.8 ships/shipped with Five 1.0 which is very old and no longer
actively maintained. Most ppl doing currently development with Zope
2.8
are using Five 1.2. Should we upgrade the Five version in Zope 2.8
to Five 1.2 to make their lives
Hi all,
two weeks ago, I submitted a patch against Zope-2.9.1 that makes the
'MS-Author-Via' header configurable in zope.conf (
http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1441 ) but I did not hear a single
comment about it, so I'm guessing nobody noticed it.
As the original collector entry referred to
--On 27. März 2006 16:16:11 +0200 Patrick Decat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
two weeks ago, I submitted a patch against Zope-2.9.1 that makes the
'MS-Author-Via' header configurable in zope.conf (
http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1441 ) but I did not hear a single
comment about it, so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick Decat wrote:
two weeks ago, I submitted a patch against Zope-2.9.1 that makes the
'MS-Author-Via' header configurable in zope.conf (
http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1441 ) but I did not hear a single
comment about it, so I'm guessing
OK, sorry about raising an issue that I was not around to comment on.
First, there seems to be a good deal of confusion on what FileSystemSite
or the DirectoryView portions of CMF are. They are simply a way to have
Zope2 programmatic content stored directly on the filesystem, including
dtml,
On Mon, 2006-27-03 at 07:35 +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
Zope 2.8 ships/shipped with Five 1.0 which is very old and no longer
actively maintained. Most ppl doing currently development with Zope 2.8
are using Five 1.2. Should we upgrade the Five version in Zope 2.8 to Five
1.2 to make their
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 27 Mar 2006, at 11:55, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
Zope 2.8 ships/shipped with Five 1.0 which is very old and no longer
actively maintained. Most ppl doing currently development with Zope
2.8 are
Andreas Jung lists at zopyx.com writes:
...
Should we upgrade the Five version in Zope 2.8 to Five
1.2 to make their lives a bit easier?
+1 on a 2.8.7 with a viable Five.
Alec Mitchell
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote at 2006-3-27 11:10 -0500:
...
CMF is a lot of overhead
Overhead of what kind?
to pull in just to get DirectoryView, and exactly
what to install to get DirectoryView and as little else as possible
installed
is not documented.
You install Products/CMFCore and register
-1... Five 1.2 has quite a few differences from Five 1.0 that would
stop products written for Five 1.0 from working properly. I've not
gone to 2.9 on a few projects for this reason (sticking with 2.8).
2.9 is where the new version belongs, IMO.
- C
On Mar 27, 2006, at 12:35 AM, Andreas
Dieter Maurer wrote:
I've been noticing a situation for some time that my 2.8.5 Z2 is running
out of threads. When doing an lsof on it, I see a large number of TCP
handles in CLOSE_WAIT state.
It seems something's not properly clearing down the connection to
release the thread.
I doubt
Tres Seaver wrote:
I don't get what you mean: FilesystemSite *is* a separate packaging of
the DirectoryView /FS{DTMLMethod/PythonScript/PageTemplate/SQLMethod}
stuff, without any CMF dependencies.
Yes, exactly, there are several of them. Usually forked off from CMF's
DirectoryView at some
Chris McDonough wrote:
-1... Five 1.2 has quite a few differences from Five 1.0 that would stop
products written for Five 1.0 from working properly. I've not gone to
2.9 on a few projects for this reason (sticking with 2.8). 2.9 is where
the new version belongs, IMO.
Out of curiosity, what
19 matches
Mail list logo
