Re: [Zope-dev] Re: State of 'Zope211-3.4-integration' branch

2007-06-25 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
On 25 Jun 2007, at 12:09 , Andreas Jung wrote: --On 25. Juni 2007 10:13:44 +0200 Andreas Zeidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jun 25, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: true, but i think philipp was only asking about 2.11 for the time being. i agree the fix should be backpor

[Zope-dev] Re: State of 'Zope211-3.4-integration' branch

2007-06-25 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On Jun 25, 2007, at 10:48 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: Andreas Jung wrote: --On 25. Juni 2007 12:56:08 -0400 Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Shouldn't the Zope2 trunk be using ZODB 3.8 at this point? And won't we therefore get Jim's fix? The 2.11 integration branch also uses ZODB 3.8. So

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: State of 'Zope211-3.4-integration' branch

2007-06-25 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On Jun 25, 2007, at 6:24 PM, Andreas Jung wrote: Back to the original subject...any objections to merge this 2.11 integration branch back on the trunk *with* failing ZClasses tests. hmm, maybe you lost me somewhere, but aren't we talking about your svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/Zope/branche

[Zope-dev] Re: State of 'Zope211-3.4-integration' branch

2007-06-25 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Jung wrote: > > --On 25. Juni 2007 12:56:08 -0400 Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Andreas Jung wrote: >>> --On 25. Juni 2007 13:00:38 +0200 Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [Zope-dev] Merging #1441 fix to 2.10 branch?

2007-06-25 Thread Sidnei da Silva
On 6/25/07, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --On 25. Juni 2007 14:38:59 -0300 Sidnei da Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there, > > I would like to merge the fix for issue #1441 into the 2.10 branch. It > restores a 'feature' that was removed almost 35 months ago, Any idea why it w

[Zope-dev] SVN problems merging the Zope 2.11 integration branch

2007-06-25 Thread Andreas Jung
I am trying to merge the /Zope211-3.4-integration branch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/sandboxes/Zope/Zope211-3.4-integration> svn info Path: . URL: svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/repos/main/Zope/branches/Zope211-3.4-integration Repository Root: svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/repos/main Repository UUID: 62d5b8

Re: [Zope-dev] Merging #1441 fix to 2.10 branch?

2007-06-25 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 25. Juni 2007 14:38:59 -0300 Sidnei da Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi there, I would like to merge the fix for issue #1441 into the 2.10 branch. It restores a 'feature' that was removed almost 35 months ago, Any idea why it was removed? but the feature will be disabled by defa

[Zope-dev] Merging #1441 fix to 2.10 branch?

2007-06-25 Thread Sidnei da Silva
Hi there, I would like to merge the fix for issue #1441 into the 2.10 branch. It restores a 'feature' that was removed almost 35 months ago, but the feature will be disabled by default, so should not affect anything unless you enable it in zope.conf. I've added good test coverage for it, and it h

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: Resolution of issue #2333 before next maintenance release(s)?

2007-06-25 Thread Tim Hicks
Tres Seaver wrote: > Tres Seaver wrote: >> Tim Hicks wrote: >>> Hi, >>> Apparently a maintenance release for 2.10 is imminent. Would it be >>> possible for someone to review the report for issue #2333 @: >>> . >>> The fix provided there comes with a test.

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: State of 'Zope211-3.4-integration' branch

2007-06-25 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 25. Juni 2007 12:56:08 -0400 Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Jung wrote: --On 25. Juni 2007 13:00:38 +0200 Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/25/07, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think some time ea

[Zope-dev] Re: Resolution of issue #2333 before next maintenance release(s)?

2007-06-25 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tres Seaver wrote: > Tim Hicks wrote: >> Hi, > >> Apparently a maintenance release for 2.10 is imminent. Would it be >> possible for someone to review the report for issue #2333 @: > >> . > >> The fix provi

[Zope-dev] Re: State of 'Zope211-3.4-integration' branch

2007-06-25 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Jung wrote: > > --On 25. Juni 2007 13:00:38 +0200 Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 6/25/07, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I think some time early next week (depending on my schedule). >> OK. I also promised to

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: State of 'Zope211-3.4-integration' branch

2007-06-25 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 25. Juni 2007 13:00:38 +0200 Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/25/07, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think some time early next week (depending on my schedule). OK. I also promised to merge #2153, that gives me time to do that (unless somebody protests). http:/

[Zope-dev] Re: Resolution of issue #2333 before next maintenance release(s)?

2007-06-25 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tim Hicks wrote: > Hi, > > Apparently a maintenance release for 2.10 is imminent. Would it be > possible for someone to review the report for issue #2333 @: > > . > > The fix provided there comes with a tes

[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 5 OK

2007-06-25 Thread Zope Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sun Jun 24 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Mon Jun 25 12:00:00 2007 UTC. There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Unit Tests. Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: Zope Unit Tests Date: Sun Jun 24 20:52:06 EDT 2007 URL

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: State of 'Zope211-3.4-integration' branch

2007-06-25 Thread Lennart Regebro
On 6/25/07, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think some time early next week (depending on my schedule). OK. I also promised to merge #2153, that gives me time to do that (unless somebody protests). http://zope.org/Collectors/Zope/2153 -- Lennart Regebro: Zope and Plone consulting. ht

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: State of 'Zope211-3.4-integration' branch

2007-06-25 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 25. Juni 2007 12:27:48 +0200 Andreas Zeidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jun 25, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Andreas Jung wrote: On Jun 25, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: That would be great, especially since we're on the verge of new maintenance releases for 2.9 and 2.10.

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: State of 'Zope211-3.4-integration' branch

2007-06-25 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On Jun 25, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Andreas Jung wrote: On Jun 25, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: That would be great, especially since we're on the verge of new maintenance releases for 2.9 and 2.10. when are they due? unfortunately i won't be able to do the backporting bef

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: State of 'Zope211-3.4-integration' branch

2007-06-25 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 25. Juni 2007 10:13:44 +0200 Andreas Zeidler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jun 25, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: true, but i think philipp was only asking about 2.11 for the time being. i agree the fix should be backported, though. i'd even volunteer to do it, if

[Zope-dev] Resolution of issue #2333 before next maintenance release(s)?

2007-06-25 Thread Tim Hicks
Hi, Apparently a maintenance release for 2.10 is imminent. Would it be possible for someone to review the report for issue #2333 @: . The fix provided there comes with a test. If it's deemed suitable, could someone with commit privileges apply the patc

[Zope-dev] Re: State of 'Zope211-3.4-integration' branch

2007-06-25 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On Jun 25, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: true, but i think philipp was only asking about 2.11 for the time being. i agree the fix should be backported, though. i'd even volunteer to do it, if nobody else wants to... :) That would be great, especially since we're on th

[Zope-dev] Re: State of 'Zope211-3.4-integration' branch

2007-06-25 Thread Philipp von Weitershausen
On 21 Jun 2007, at 23:47 , Andreas Zeidler wrote: On Jun 21, 2007, at 9:07 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: ah, here it is: http://svn.zope.org/?rev=76408&view=rev should fix the zclasses problem, if i'm not totally mistaken. That change needs backporting, I think, to the ZODB 3.6 line (for 2.9) and