I asked this a month ago without getting any responses, so I'll give it
one more try:
We recently ran into an issue with debug/development mode when making
z3c.hashedresource work with Zope2: The package implements different
behaviour depending on whether the dev-mode feature is enabled in the
On 15.09.09 08:00, Thomas Lotze wrote:
I asked this a month ago without getting any responses, so I'll give it
one more try:
We recently ran into an issue with debug/development mode when making
z3c.hashedresource work with Zope2: The package implements different
behaviour depending on
Andreas Jung wrote:
On 15.09.09 08:00, Thomas Lotze wrote:
- Is Zope2 debug mode semantically equivalent to ZCML dev-mode, i.e.
should the two be linked to each other in the first place?
What is the ZCML dev-mode?
It's a so-called ZCML feature that can be used with ZCML conditionals.
On 15.09.09 08:27, Thomas Lotze wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
On 15.09.09 08:00, Thomas Lotze wrote:
- Is Zope2 debug mode semantically equivalent to ZCML dev-mode, i.e.
should the two be linked to each other in the first place?
What is the ZCML dev-mode?
It's a
Andreas Jung wrote:
I can not remember having seen any support this feature. If you need it,
please add it to the Zope 2 trunk
I'll see about it ASAP.
(however too late for the Zope 2.12 release, sorry :-))
That's fine.
--
Thomas
___
Zope-Dev
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Thomas Lotze t...@gocept.com wrote:
- Is Zope2 debug mode semantically equivalent to ZCML dev-mode, i.e.
should the two be linked to each other in the first place?
I don't know what kind of functionality is usually switched on by the
zcml dev-mode. Are there
Hey,
I think it would be good if we could (eventually) separate the Zope
Toolkit development documentation (what's published by
docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit now) from the Zope Toolkit release documentation.
Zope Toolkit dev documentation:
* aimed at people who need to *manage* the development of
+1
Jim
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
Hey,
I think it would be good if we could (eventually) separate the Zope
Toolkit development documentation (what's published by
docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit now) from the Zope Toolkit release documentation.
On 2009-09-11, Sebastien Douche sdou...@gmail.com wrote:
Caution with the actual workflow, 2 differences between SVN and Hg :
- you cannot check out partial repository
- external does not exist
Missing externals has been a pain point for me.
There are however buildout recipes that can pull
On 2009-09-11, Benji York be...@zope.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Martijn Faassen
faas...@startifact.com wrote:
* I (and others) use tools to do releases (zest.releaser in my case).
These tools are based on this
On 14.09.09 20:02, Gary Poster wrote:
On Sep 11, 2009, at 9:34 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Christian Theune wrote:
[snip]
Same here. We also ended up in many deadlock situations having to
sacrifice chickens for SVN to resume operations. That's why we
On 9/15/09 10:33 , Reinout van Rees wrote:
On 2009-09-11, Sebastien Douchesdou...@gmail.com wrote:
Caution with the actual workflow, 2 differences between SVN and Hg :
- you cannot check out partial repository
- external does not exist
Missing externals has been a pain point for me.
On 2009-09-11, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
but if it is, I
propose to using 0 instead of the dev of the next version. Where I've
used '0', I've found it to be less error prone. Ir also requires less
effort because it means you never have to edit the
On 2009-09-11, Gary Poster gary.pos...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi. pypi advertises http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zc.zservertracelog/1.2.0
but there is no download to be found! :-) Could whoever made the
release add the download?
Related to the recent 1.2dev or 0 discussion where zest.releaser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
in the face of organizing the ZTK 1.0 release Hanno and I ported the
open issues as blueprints to Launchpad (and added some more suggestions
along the way). You can see them here:
https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/zopetoolkit
So, new
On Sep 15, 2009, at 4:56 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
In my experience distributed SCMs add bottlenecks to development
that we
currently do not have in the Zope community: with both our shared svn
repository and distributed SCMs everyone can branch everything, but
with
distributed SCMs
On 9/15/09 13:56 , Gary Poster wrote:
On Sep 15, 2009, at 4:56 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
In my experience distributed SCMs add bottlenecks to development that we
currently do not have in the Zope community: with both our shared svn
repository and distributed SCMs everyone can branch
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Mon Sep 14 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue Sep 15 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Mon Sep 14 20:43:42 EDT 2009
URL:
On Sep 15, 2009, at 7:59 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
On 9/15/09 13:56 , Gary Poster wrote:
2) Our current arrangement, as well as many others, can be
accomplished
with a DVCS. Launchpad + Bzr definitely support this. You would
have a
Launchpad team of committers, with managed
On Tuesday 15 September 2009, Reinout van Rees wrote:
On 2009-09-11, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
but if it is, I
propose to using 0 instead of the dev of the next version. Where I've
used '0', I've found it to be less error prone. Ir also requires
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 07:56:42AM -0400, Gary Poster wrote:
Generally, I'd be surprised to learn that Bzr/Launchpad were alone in
supporting this, but they are the only ones I can vouch for. For
instance, I'm almost positive that github also allows you to have
multiple committers to a
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Patrick Gerken
do3cc...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have removed that profiler for python2.6
My understanding of the python api is, that we were using an
undocumented feature to merge two hotshot profiler results.
Since nobody maintains hotshot any longer,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 15 September 2009, Reinout van Rees wrote:
On 2009-09-11, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
but if it is, I
propose to using 0 instead of the dev of the next version. Where I've
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
I *like* the property of the 0 strategy that it makes the job of
releasing a package a little harder: releaseing software should be a
thoughtful, careful process, not something you do without a bit of
hesitation and
Hi from the Grok sprint,
Jan-Jaap from thehealthagency and myself spent some time on getting
extensive buildbot coverage for the ZTK (and many other Zope things)
going. It's all three Python versions (2.4 - 2.6) on all major
platforms (Windows, Mac OS, 32-bit Ubuntu + 64-bit Ubuntu).
You can see
On 2009-09-15, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
If you are making releases without having the CHANGES.txt open in your
browser, then you need to put down the keyboard and back away slowly, so
that nobody gets hurt. Reviewing / correcting the changelog (and
comparing it with a diff
Hi Hanno,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
We are down to zero-build problems for the ZTK and just one test
failure. This is in zope.testing in testrunner-layers-buff.txt.
That smells like something Gary has touched recently.
-- Sidnei
Hi Dan
I have an issue with the latest changes in
zope.publisher.http.py
The redirect method in HTTPResponse http.py line: 880
forces a ValueError. Because the Apache HTTP_HOST
and the target_host to not compare.
def redirect(self, location, status=None, trusted=False):
location =
Hi
Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] official release policy ZTK is still
not changed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Tuesday 15 September 2009, Reinout van Rees wrote:
On 2009-09-11, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Sep 15, 2009, at 6:33 PM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
Hi Hanno,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Hanno Schlichting
ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
We are down to zero-build problems for the ZTK and just one test
failure. This is in zope.testing in testrunner-layers-buff.txt.
That smells like
30 matches
Mail list logo
