more stable is the Java API,
in Point 2 and 3 of this entry:
http://www.z3lab.org/sections/blogs/jean-marc-orliaguet/2006_09_23_times-they-changin
But it is not fair to compare the stability of a programming language
standard modules API with a application framework api. But maybe I am
not good
Jim Fulton wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
[snip]
I think that having one name for two radically different, though
related,
things is very confusing. There are really
2 main technologies that people care about:
1. The Zope app server. This is characterized by things like
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
[snip]
I would vote for spelling out Zed (which would also be a little easier
to google but might create trademark problems). The namespace package
could either be 'z' or 'zed'.
Then again, I really should take Jim's side and stay out
Hi!
I didn't know that methods needed to have docstrings to be traversable
(it took me some time to find out why I was getting Not found errors
on some of a tool's methods). Is there any reason to still have such a
feature in Zope2.9? or at least maybe there could be a hint in the
trace
Paul Winkler wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 11:34:17AM +0100, Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
Hi!
I didn't know that methods needed to have docstrings to be traversable
(it took me some time to find out why I was getting Not found errors
on some of a tool's methods). Is there any reason
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
I didn't know that methods needed to have docstrings to be traversable
(it took me some time to find out why I was getting Not found errors
on some of a tool's methods). Is there any reason
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote at 2005-12-4 22:28 +0100:
...
In the log flle I'd like to be informed about events that are
unexpected. Conflict errors of this kind occur by design.
This argument is not convincing:
In a similar way, I could argue that MemoryErrors
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote at 2005-12-2 23:57 +0100:
... on what level to report retried ConflictError ...
BLATHER (I have never be able to get any meaningful information from
them, except that zope tries several times)
That's because the generated messages *were
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Please vote for the level at which you want to log retried conflict
errors. These are the ConflictErrors that aren't returned to the user
but automatically retried by the Zope publisher.
1. Do you want these ConflictErrors retried logs to be at level:
- INFO
-
Martijn Faassen wrote:
...
Outside the Zope community Zope 3 doesn't have such a great image
indeed. It's either ignored, or it's actively rejected. There is a lot
of competition with other frameworks. Zope 3 is currently not doing
particularly well in this competition, something we need to
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
[snip]
It is a bit like this: the zope2 community wants the zope3 technology
and zope3 wants the zope2 community.
I like this analysis. :)
I think the question about the technology should be treated as such
on a technical level
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
kit blake wrote:
Wow, what a difference two days makes. I heard about the ZF
announcement by telephone two mornings ago, and I breathed a huge sigh
of relief. It solves a problem we've been worrying about for years. It
means we can sit across from a nervous
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
This is really great news!
I am going to start working at getting Chalmers to be one of the key
players in the foundation which would make the foundation even more
vendor-neutral. I am confident that this will go through
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
This is really great news!
I am going to start working at getting Chalmers to be one of the key
players in the foundation which would make the foundation even more
Chris McDonough wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 07:52 -0400, Stephan Richter wrote:
Also, I agree with Andreas and Philipp that developers should be members, not
companies. Otherwise, how could I, as an independent developer, have a say?
BTW, this is also positive for companies, since they can
Eric Barroca wrote:
Hello,
Following the announces from Zope Corporation yesterday about their
willingness to create a Zope Foundation (that would manage
independently Zope 2 and Zope 3 projects) and to participate actively
in the Z3ECM project, I would like to express briefly Nuxeo's
Hi!
the following zpt snippet crashes zope 2.7.3 on Linux (the python
process hangs).
tal:block define=
items python: {u'\xc4': ''};
key python: u'\xc4'
content=items/?key /
can someone confirm that the bug is present in zope 2.7.4-b1 too before
I do a bug report?
regards /JM
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
Hi!
the following zpt snippet crashes zope 2.7.3 on Linux (the python
process hangs).
tal:block define=
items python: {u'\xc4': ''};
key python: u'\xc4'
content=items/?key /
can someone confirm that the bug is present in zope 2.7.4-b1 too
before I do a bug report
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On Donnerstag, 9. Dezember 2004 13:12 Uhr +0100 Jean-Marc Orliaguet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
Hi!
the following zpt snippet crashes zope 2.7.3 on Linux (the python
process hangs).
tal:block define=
items python: {u'\xc4': ''};
key python: u'\xc4
19 matches
Mail list logo
