On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:35 AM, Sebastien Douche wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 18:21, Martijn Faassen wrote:
>>> The KGS should not support ranges IMO. It should be updated as new
>>> versions are released. It should also be tagged when updated.
>>
>> +1. No ranges. If you want to update a ver
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 18:21, Martijn Faassen wrote:
>> The KGS should not support ranges IMO. It should be updated as new
>> versions are released. It should also be tagged when updated.
>
> +1. No ranges. If you want to update a version in your own app's
> buildout you should be able to overrid
Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Martijn Faassen
> wrote:
> ...
>> That sounds reasonable, as long as it is documented. I got confused at
>> first about the term 'test branch', but you just mean a non-maintenance
>> branch of a package to do some development on. The special th
Hello,
That's great.
I think if this works we should include some more mission critical
packages, like zc.buildout.
(Last time I checked zc.buildout had very bad test results on win32)
Wednesday, August 26, 2009, 4:46:37 PM, you wrote:
JJD> 2009/8/25 Martijn Faassen :
>> Hi there,
>>
>> Fabio T
2009/8/25 Martijn Faassen :
> Hi there,
>
> Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
> [snip]
>> Will we have an "official" buildbot instance somewhere under the zope.org
>> domain? In this case, I'm willing to administer and maintain it, if nobody
>> else steps in.
>
> I'd be happy to see this. We can do this wi
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
...
> That sounds reasonable, as long as it is documented. I got confused at
> first about the term 'test branch', but you just mean a non-maintenance
> branch of a package to do some development on. The special thing is here
> that we'd wait
Hi there,
Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
[snip]
> Will we have an "official" buildbot instance somewhere under the zope.org
> domain? In this case, I'm willing to administer and maintain it, if nobody
> else steps in.
I'd be happy to see this. We can do this with a DNS thing
(buildout.zope.org) or we
Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
> ...
>> One question, and I know I'm late in on this so feel free to point me at
>> previous discussions, but say the KGS uses some.egg 1.0.0, a bug gets fixed
>> in some.egg and 1.0.1 is released. Does a whole new KGS need
Benji York wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
>> Keep in mind that the thing we're talking about is pretty simple,
>> basically a single file. Branches beyond a test branch seem like
>> overkill. Maybe I missunderstand you. What sorts of branches did you
>> have in mind?
Hello,
* 2009-08-18 14:57, Jan-Jaap Driessen wrote:
> I would like to volunteer OSX buildbot slaves, buildbot master if necessary.
I'm currently running a buildbot master with two salves (linux 32bit and
64bit):
http://buildbot.tranchitella.it/ztk/
It is running the tests in the trunk for a
2009/8/14 Benji York :
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
>> ...
>>> One question, and I know I'm late in on this so feel free to point me at
>>> previous discussions, but say the KGS uses some.egg 1.0.0, a bug gets fixed
>>
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Sebastien Douche wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 19:20, Jim Fulton wrote:
>
> Hi Jim
>
>> - We need to create a test branch.
>>
>> - When a developer wants to update a project version, they check out
>> the test branch, make a local version change and run the tests
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 19:20, Jim Fulton wrote:
Hi Jim
> - We need to create a test branch.
>
> - When a developer wants to update a project version, they check out
> the test branch, make a local version change and run the tests. If the
> tests pass the check the change into the test branch.
>
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Stephan
> Richter wrote:
>> On Friday 14 August 2009, Jim Fulton wrote:
>>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Sounds good to me.
>>
>>> BTW, in my zopetoolkit dev branch, I've created a kgs directory to
>>> hold the ztk.cfg file an
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Stephan
Richter wrote:
> On Friday 14 August 2009, Jim Fulton wrote:
>> Thoughts?
>
> Sounds good to me.
>
>> BTW, in my zopetoolkit dev branch, I've created a kgs directory to
>> hold the ztk.cfg file and a ztk kgs buildout. If no one complains
>> about this soon,
On Friday 14 August 2009, Jim Fulton wrote:
> Thoughts?
Sounds good to me.
> BTW, in my zopetoolkit dev branch, I've created a kgs directory to
> hold the ztk.cfg file and a ztk kgs buildout. If no one complains
> about this soon, I'll commit this to the trunk and this will become
> the official
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Benji York wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
>>> Keep in mind that the thing we're talking about is pretty simple,
>>> basically a single file. Branches beyond a test branch seem like
>
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Benji York wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
>> Keep in mind that the thing we're talking about is pretty simple,
>> basically a single file. Branches beyond a test branch seem like
>> overkill. Maybe I missunderstand you. What sorts of b
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
> Keep in mind that the thing we're talking about is pretty simple,
> basically a single file. Branches beyond a test branch seem like
> overkill. Maybe I missunderstand you. What sorts of branches did you
> have in mind? Do you imagibe long-stan
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Benji York wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Benji York wrote:
>
>>> By "buildbot output" do you mean simply the fact that all tests passed
>>> on all platforms?
>>
>> I'm being intentionally vague, but w
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Benji York wrote:
>> By "buildbot output" do you mean simply the fact that all tests passed
>> on all platforms?
>
> I'm being intentionally vague, but we need to know that the tests
> apply to the versions we're
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Benji York wrote:
...
>> - We maintain windows and linux buildbots (or equivalent) against both
>> the test branch and trunk for Python 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6.
>
> I assume we'd have OS X buildbots as well (if someone will volunteer
> them).
That would be a nice to have.
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
> ...
>> One question, and I know I'm late in on this so feel free to point me at
>> previous discussions, but say the KGS uses some.egg 1.0.0, a bug gets fixed
>> in some.egg and 1.0.1 is rel
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
...
> One question, and I know I'm late in on this so feel free to point me at
> previous discussions, but say the KGS uses some.egg 1.0.0, a bug gets fixed
> in some.egg and 1.0.1 is released. Does a whole new KGS need to be cut or is
> there s
24 matches
Mail list logo
