Hi,
When I define a principal in my site.zcml and have it use the
SSHAPasswordManager, I cannot login as a TypeError: character mapping
must return integer, None or unicode is raised in the checkPassword()
methid. It took me quite a while to figure out what was going on...
The site.zcml
On 2009-9-22 18:59, Daniel Holth wrote:
At least on Python 2.6, SSHAPasswordManager().checkPassword(hash,
password) fails if hash is unicode, which it always is if stored in some
databases. SSHAPasswordManager should encode the hash to utf-8 before
trying to un-base64.
Isn't that a bug in
sqlite for example will always return strings as unicode strings, or
it will always return strings as byte strings. It doesn't know how to
return the username colum as one kind of string and the hash column as
another kind of string.
I think this is really a bug in the urlsafe base64 module. This
On 2009-9-23 13:29, Daniel Holth wrote:
sqlite for example will always return strings as unicode strings, or
it will always return strings as byte strings. It doesn't know how to
return the username colum as one kind of string and the hash column as
another kind of string.
SQLite is an
You are right, it is an accident that unicode can be encoded to base64. It
just annoys me that the Python 2.6 error for this is TypeError: character
mapping must return integer, None or unicode.
In that case, how would you feel about updating PlainTextPasswordManager
instead? It is not like the
At least on Python 2.6, SSHAPasswordManager().checkPassword(hash, password)
fails if hash is unicode, which it always is if stored in some databases.
SSHAPasswordManager should encode the hash to utf-8 before trying to
un-base64.
zope.password is conspicuously missing a DelegatingPasswordManager
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 13:07 -0600, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Christian Theune wrote:
I remember that at the sprint we used to identify packages which are
always good. E.g. zope.interface is a declared no-brainer to add to
your dependencies. The other two that keep popping up that we *might*
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 17:27 +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
Stephan Richter wrote:
[snip]
In my opinion going for an extra here just to avoid this is speculating
a bit too much right now. Do we really have users that want to use
zope.password and really don't want zope.component
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Theune wrote:
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 17:27 +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
Stephan Richter wrote:
[snip]
In my opinion going for an extra here just to avoid this is speculating
a bit too much right now. Do we really have users
Christian Theune wrote:
I remember that at the sprint we used to identify packages which are
always good. E.g. zope.interface is a declared no-brainer to add to
your dependencies. The other two that keep popping up that we *might*
wanna white-list are zope.schema and zope.component.
To
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Dan Korostelev wrote:
This was done to avoid dependency on zope.schema. However, I also find
it very useful to have that vocabulary in zope.password. I think we
can add it to the vocabulary submodule without adding dependency on
zope.schema at egg level, because one
Hey,
If it's more convenient to have the vocabulary available in
zope.password, by all means add it there.
Regards,
Martijn
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML
Hi there,
Okay, having read the whole thread, there seem to be two forces pulling
on zope.password:
* it'd be nice if zope.password had the vocabulary so that you didn't
have to include zope.app.authentication anymore just to get it.
* it'd be nice if zope.password didn't need any extra
On Wednesday 11 March 2009, Martijn Faassen wrote:
I think the latter is the least important right now, especially since
zope.component and zope.schema are already very foundational libraries.
So just add the vocabulary to zope.password if that is the only new
dependencies it will pull in as a
Dan Korostelev wrote:
[snip]
Well, as I said before, I wanted to use zope.password in my old Pylons
application that only uses zope.interface currently. I don't expect it
to be developed in more zope-ish way (though I don't expect it to be
developed much in near future :)), so I'd like to
Hi there,
Stephan Richter wrote:
[snip]
In my opinion going for an extra here just to avoid this is speculating
a bit too much right now. Do we really have users that want to use
zope.password and really don't want zope.component and zope.schema? If
so, we'll hear from them when they speak up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
Stephan Richter wrote:
[snip]
In my opinion going for an extra here just to avoid this is speculating
a bit too much right now. Do we really have users that want to use
zope.password and really don't want
2009/3/10 Roger Ineichen d...@projekt01.ch:
Hi steering group and Dan
During update z3c.authenticator and replace the password with the
new zope.apssword implementation, I saw that the vocabulary
Passsword Manager Names is not available in the zope.password
package.
I think the password
Dan Korostelev wrote:
This was done to avoid dependency on zope.schema. However, I also find
it very useful to have that vocabulary in zope.password. I think we
can add it to the vocabulary submodule without adding dependency on
zope.schema at egg level, because one who wants to use the
2009/3/10 Hanno Schlichting hanno...@hannosch.eu:
Dan Korostelev wrote:
This was done to avoid dependency on zope.schema. However, I also find
it very useful to have that vocabulary in zope.password. I think we
can add it to the vocabulary submodule without adding dependency on
zope.schema at
Dan Korostelev wrote:
2009/3/10 Hanno Schlichting hanno...@hannosch.eu:
Either you have a dependency and declare it or you don't have a
dependency. Since we don't want to use extras anymore, I think this
calls for another package which depends on zope.password and zope.schema.
I still don't
2009/3/10 Roger Ineichen d...@projekt01.ch:
Hi Steering group, Hanno, Dan
Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] zope.password
Dan Korostelev wrote:
2009/3/10 Hanno Schlichting hanno...@hannosch.eu:
Either you have a dependency and declare it or you don't have a
dependency. Since we don't want to use
On Tuesday 10 March 2009, Dan Korostelev wrote:
Either you have a dependency and declare it or you don't have a
dependency. Since we don't want to use extras anymore, I think this
calls for another package which depends on zope.password and zope.schema.
I still don't like/get the idea of
Hi Stephan
Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] zope.password
On Tuesday 10 March 2009, Dan Korostelev wrote:
Either you have a dependency and declare it or you don't have a
dependency. Since we don't want to use extras anymore, I think
this calls for another package which depends
Hi Dan
Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] zope.password
2009/3/10 Roger Ineichen d...@projekt01.ch:
Hi Steering group, Hanno, Dan
Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] zope.password
Dan Korostelev wrote:
2009/3/10 Hanno Schlichting hanno...@hannosch.eu:
Either you have a dependency and declare
25 matches
Mail list logo
