Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [patch] More secure cookie crumbler?

2004-04-13 Thread Kapil Thangavelu
fwiw, Simon Eisenmann checked in a SessionStorage product into the collective which does much the same. released under the zpl http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/collective/SessionCrumbler/ -kapil ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Zope + Ape + Subversion (was: RE: [Zope-dev] Using a truely revis ion based storage for Zope ?)

2004-04-13 Thread Kapil Thangavelu
On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 18:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: G'Day, Well, step one is done ... I now have Zope + Ape using Subversion as it's filesystem !! cool! This is step one because, as Shawn suggested (Thanks for the pointer, that's what I needed!), this simply means that Zope uses SVN

Re: Zope + Ape + Subversion (was: RE: [Zope-dev] Using a truely revis ion based storage for Zope ?)

2004-04-13 Thread Arthur Chan Chi Chuen
Hi all, I've read your discussion about version control, it seems a cool thing you guys making good progress. Btw, can I ask is the Ape using Subversion in Zope stable? how able CMF stuff? I wanna make/find a document management system which can provide some kinda version control in Plone.

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [patch] More secure cookie crumbler?

2004-04-13 Thread Lennart Regebro
From: Shane Hathaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] Making cookie authentication secure is surprisingly difficult, and you've barely taken one step. I don't want CookieCrumbler to go in this direction at all. A much more fruitful endeavor would be to simply add digest authentication support to Zope's

[Zope-dev] PlacelessTranslationService syntax

2004-04-13 Thread Milos Prudek
What's the correct ZPT syntax for PlacelessTranslationService? I tried this: b i18n:translate= i18n:domain=ibc i18n:target=string:czGood morning/b This gets rendered into: bGood morning/b No translation, although I do have an entry for 'Good morning' in my .po file under an 'ibc' domain.

Re: Zope + Ape + Subversion (was: RE: [Zope-dev] Using a truely revis ion based storage for Zope ?)

2004-04-13 Thread Brad Clements
On 12 Apr 2004 at 18:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyways, I'm just rambling by now ... Comments, thoughts and constructive criticism welcome ! This sounds wonderful! Regarding versions. Perhap you can have a control panel setting that selects the branch to publish by default. The ZMI

[Zope-dev] [Zope-CMF] Tests (Was: some small proposals)

2004-04-13 Thread Lennart Regebro
I would like to see the following functionality when it comes to unit testing: 1. An easy consistent way to run ONE unit test, no matter if it's made for Zope, or CMF, and no matter it it's done with straight unittest or ZopeTestCase. 2. An easy and consistent way to run all unit test in a

[Zope-dev] Zope and zope

2004-04-13 Thread Jim Fulton
Zope 2 has a package named Zope. Zope 3 has a package named zope. Starting with Zope 2.8, parts of Zope 3 will be included in Zope 2. As things stand, this will require having both Zope and zope packages. Python can handle this fine, however, it will require putting the packages in separate

Re: Zope + Ape + Subversion (was: RE: [Zope-dev] Using a truely revis ion based storage for Zope ?)

2004-04-13 Thread Shane Hathaway
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is step one because, as Shawn suggested (Thanks for the pointer, that's what I needed!), this simply means that Zope uses SVN purely as a filesystem. Because of subversion's nature, I want to look at 2 things beyond this that traditional

Re: Zope + Ape + Subversion (was: RE: [Zope-dev] Using a truely revis ion based storage for Zope ?)

2004-04-13 Thread Shane Hathaway
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Kapil Thangavelu wrote: since objects modified in a version are in essence locked from participating in other transactions, actions like modifying content in a version in a cmf site amounts to locking the catalog from changes outside of the version, which amounts to

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope and zope

2004-04-13 Thread Chris McDonough
+1 It looks like in the Zope 2 trunk, there are only a very few places that rely on import Zope or from Zope import. It looks like it would be possible to change the name of the Zope package in Zope 2 to zope2 or something without a tremendous amount of work. And as long as a module alias was

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: start_new_thread / user issue

2004-04-13 Thread Toby Gustafson
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Tres Seaver wrote: Given that you trust yourself ;), you can add a security context from within the second thread; you could pass the user ID to the thread via one of several forms of currying, e.g. via instance variables:: I'm not sure if I trust myself in real

[Zope-dev] Zope Developers

2004-04-13 Thread Paul Edward Brinich
Hello, I was wondering if someone on this list could point me in the direction of an appropriate place to post Zope job openings. I am looking for an audience well-versed in Zope. Thanks for any guidance! -Paul Brinich ___ Zope-Dev maillist -

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope Developers

2004-04-13 Thread Fred Drake
On Tuesday 13 April 2004 01:44 pm, Paul Edward Brinich wrote: I was wondering if someone on this list could point me in the direction of an appropriate place to post Zope job openings. I am looking for an audience well-versed in Zope. Thanks for any guidance! There's the Python Job Board:

[Zope-dev] zLOG is dead

2004-04-13 Thread Fred Drake
zLOG is dead The zLOG package used for logging throughout ZODB, ZEO, and Zope 2 has been declared obsolete. All logging for Zope products will use the logging package from Python's standard library. The zLOG package still exists in Zope 2 and the separate package for

[Zope-dev] Re: PlacelessTranslationService syntax

2004-04-13 Thread Christian Heimes
Milos Prudek wrote: What's the correct ZPT syntax for PlacelessTranslationService? PTS is just a translation service for ZPT. It doesn't add any functionality to ZPT. I tried this: b i18n:translate= i18n:domain=ibc i18n:target=string:czGood morning/b This gets rendered into: bGood morning/b

RE: Zope + Ape + Subversion (was: RE: [Zope-dev] Using a truely r evis ion based storage for Zope ?)

2004-04-13 Thread Jean-Francois . Doyon
Hello, Hmmm, well it's as stable as Ape and Subversion are respectively :) I wouldn't call it stable no, it's something I did over the long week-end we just had, and that's about it :) Ape is at 0.8 and therefore becoming quite mature, I'd have to let others speak as to it stability however ...

RE: Zope + Ape + Subversion (was: RE: [Zope-dev] Using a truely r evis ion based storage for Zope ?)

2004-04-13 Thread Jean-Francois . Doyon
Brad, About the branch thing ... That's basically the idea! The bigger problem here is how to manage this both internally and from a user/administrator perspective. This paradigm only really makes sense in the CMF world anyways, and I want to focus on basic Zope before moving up to the extra

RE: Zope + Ape + Subversion (was: RE: [Zope-dev] Using a truely r evis ion based storage for Zope ?)

2004-04-13 Thread Jean-Francois . Doyon
Shane, Thanks for the extra tips, I'll check out those interfaces! I'm also getting up to speed on the whole mapper concept, where the work regarding properties handling seems to be ? I've done some reading, and I need to do some more, but I'll get there :) As for the seperation of code ... I

RE: Zope + Ape + Subversion (was: RE: [Zope-dev] Using a truely r evis ion based storage for Zope ?)

2004-04-13 Thread Arthur Chan Chi Chuen
Hi J.F, Thanks for your comments first. I understand more about the process of SVN in zope now. I am very eager to have/make a document management system with good version ctrl in Plone. Some products like Silva has versions but it's just not exactly what we need. Wish you have a good

Re: Zope + Ape + Subversion (was: RE: [Zope-dev] Using a truely r evis ion based storage for Zope ?)

2004-04-13 Thread robert rottermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Brad, About the branch thing ... That's basically the idea! The bigger problem here is how to manage this both internally and from a user/administrator perspective. This paradigm only really makes sense in the CMF world anyways, and I want to focus on basic Zope before

[Zope-dev] Re: start_new_thread / user issue

2004-04-13 Thread Tres Seaver
Toby Gustafson wrote: Your code below did not work for me because I could not find the newSecurityContext method. However, I was able to use the SecurityManagement.newSecurityManager instead, and that worked great. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. Great! Sorry for leaving off the

[Zope-dev] Re: Zope and zope

2004-04-13 Thread Tres Seaver
Chris McDonough wrote: +1 It looks like in the Zope 2 trunk, there are only a very few places that rely on import Zope or from Zope import. It looks like it would be possible to change the name of the Zope package in Zope 2 to zope2 or something without a tremendous amount of work. And as long

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Zope and zope

2004-04-13 Thread Stephan Richter
On Tuesday 13 April 2004 22:17, Tres Seaver wrote: snip Of course, having two packages with names differing only in case is a bit ugly. Do we want to consider renaming one or both of these packages to avoid the conflict? -1 to renaming 'Zope';  the amount of third-party code which we

RE: Zope + Ape + Subversion (was: RE: [Zope-dev] Using a truely r evis ion based storage for Zope ?)

2004-04-13 Thread Shane Hathaway
On Tue, 13 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the extra tips, I'll check out those interfaces! I'm also getting up to speed on the whole mapper concept, where the work regarding properties handling seems to be ? Ape supports both annotations and Zope properties. Annotations are

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Zope and zope

2004-04-13 Thread Tres Seaver
Stephan Richter wrote: On Tuesday 13 April 2004 22:17, Tres Seaver wrote: snip Of course, having two packages with names differing only in case is a bit ugly. Do we want to consider renaming one or both of these packages to avoid the conflict? -1 to renaming 'Zope'; the amount of third-party

[Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Zope and zope

2004-04-13 Thread Fred Drake
Jim Fulton noted: Of course, having two packages with names differing only in case is a bit ugly. Do we want to consider renaming one or both of these packages to avoid the conflict? A bit ugly, but I can live with it. On Tuesday 13 April 2004 22:17, Tres Seaver wrote: -1 to renaming

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Zope and zope

2004-04-13 Thread robert rottermann
Fred Drake wrote: Jim Fulton noted: Of course, having two packages with names differing only in case is a bit ugly. Do we want to consider renaming one or both of these packages to avoid the conflict? A bit ugly, but I can live with it. On Tuesday 13 April 2004 22:17, Tres Seaver wrote: -1

Re: [Zope-dev] zLOG is dead

2004-04-13 Thread Andreas Jung
+1 What is the recommend way to migrate existing code? I assume using: import logging logger = logging.getLogger(loggername). When I look through the Zope HEAD code then you are using e.g. 'zodb.conn' or 'zodb.storage' but also 'Zope' as loggername. Do we have to agree on some common usage of