On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 05:07:56AM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 10. April 2008 21:29:43 +0200 Brian Sutherland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What defines if something is the instance configuration?
Isn't ZCML just another format of configuration file? I agree it's evil
to hardcode database
--On 11. April 2008 10:09:16 +0200 Brian Sutherland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 05:07:56AM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 10. April 2008 21:29:43 +0200 Brian Sutherland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What defines if something is the instance configuration?
Isn't ZCML just
--On 11. April 2008 08:36:43 +0100 Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 10. April 2008 19:10:49 +0200 Brian Sutherland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just adding my few requirements:
- Integration into the component architecture in such a way
On 11.04.2008, at 10:09, Brian Sutherland wrote:
Unfortunately, it doesn't seem an option, right now, to avoid using
ZCML
to setup database connections. So I'm not sure how you want to
implement
your ideas?
+1
k, i didn't read the whole thread, but we (lovely systems) use
zope.storm
On Friday 11 April 2008, Bernd Dorn wrote:
although it is a few lines of code to get db uris from somewhere else,
and this could also be application code
if you use paster, you can stick options into your pater ini script. We are
currently doing this for a setting in our app.
Regards,
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 01:21:45PM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
Unfortunately, it doesn't seem an option, right now, to avoid using ZCML
to setup database connections. So I'm not sure how you want to implement
your ideas?
I have no need for ideas to be implemented. We're using SA within in
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 05:47:06PM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 9. April 2008 14:15:38 +0100 Laurence Rowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@everyone:
If we can all agree to use the same basic session and transaction
management then we should probably push for it to be included as a
sqlalchemy
--On 10. April 2008 19:10:49 +0200 Brian Sutherland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just adding my few requirements:
- Integration into the component architecture in such a way that I
can specify the db connection parameters in ZCML and that database
reflection still works. I
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 07:31:54PM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 10. April 2008 19:10:49 +0200 Brian Sutherland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just adding my few requirements:
- Integration into the component architecture in such a way that I
can specify the db connection
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 09:29:43PM +0200, Brian Sutherland wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 07:31:54PM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
Please *NO* database specific configurations within ZCML. We're running
applications in up three or four different environments and I don't want to
maintain
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On 10. April 2008 19:10:49 +0200 Brian Sutherland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just adding my few requirements:
- Integration into the component architecture in such a way that I
can specify the db
--On 10. April 2008 21:29:43 +0200 Brian Sutherland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 07:31:54PM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 10. April 2008 19:10:49 +0200 Brian Sutherland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just adding my few requirements:
- Integration into the
--On 9. April 2008 14:15:38 +0100 Laurence Rowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@everyone:
If we can all agree to use the same basic session and transaction
management then we should probably push for it to be included as a
sqlalchemy extension module.
I would be happy with such a solution. As
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Laurence Rowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The transaction manager here:
http://svn.plone.org/svn/collective/collective.lead/branches/elro-tpc/collective/lead/tx.py
Has support for TPC and savepoints. It is tested and works. The only issue
with sqlite is that
--On 10. April 2008 01:57:12 +0100 Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 9. April 2008 14:15:38 +0100 Laurence Rowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@everyone:
If we can all agree to use the same basic session and transaction
management then we should probably push for
15 matches
Mail list logo
