Re: [Zope-dev] Zope without Zope

2007-11-16 Thread Lennart Regebro
On Nov 16, 2007 11:41 AM, Lennart Regebro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 16, 2007 3:38 AM, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Help appreciated! Well, I suggest you forget about ZCML and try to use the CA directly from Python. The Pylons people would probably appreciate the lack of XML

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope without Zope

2007-11-16 Thread Lennart Regebro
On Nov 16, 2007 3:38 AM, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Help appreciated! Well, I suggest you forget about ZCML and try to use the CA directly from Python. The Pylons people would probably appreciate the lack of XML anyway. :) -- Lennart Regebro: Zope and Plone consulting.

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope without Zope

2007-11-16 Thread Chris McDonough
On Nov 16, 2007, at 9:14 AM, Martin Aspeli wrote: On Nov 16, 2007 2:07 PM, Stephan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 15 November 2007, Martin Aspeli wrote: Then I tried to easy_install zope.security, but this pulled in most of Zope, including the ZODB, ZConfig and zdaemon.

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope without Zope

2007-11-16 Thread Jim Fulton
On Nov 15, 2007, at 9:38 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote: Hi all, For fun, I just tried to make use of adapters and utilities, registered with ZCML, in a Pylons application. I installed Pylons in a virtualenv, and easy_installed zope.component and zope.interface using the KGS index for 3.4. I

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope without Zope

2007-11-16 Thread Lennart Regebro
On Nov 16, 2007 12:49 PM, Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I assume it's failed because easy_install zope.component doesn't work? No, that worked. It failed because I had 5 minutes, but it took 6. -- Lennart Regebro: Zope and Plone consulting. http://www.colliberty.com/ +33 661 58 14 64

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope without Zope

2007-11-16 Thread Stephan Richter
On Thursday 15 November 2007, Martin Aspeli wrote: Then I tried to easy_install zope.security, but this pulled in most of Zope, including the ZODB, ZConfig and zdaemon. That's a real shame - no CA (at least not with ZCML) without having pretty much all of Zope there. :( Actually, I never got

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope without Zope

2007-11-16 Thread Stephan Richter
On Friday 16 November 2007, Jim Fulton wrote: Something is broken here and it needs to be fixed. Well, the easiest solution would be to remove those misbehaving distributions from the cheeseshop. However, I think we kid ourselves if we think that the cheeseshop will always provide a stable

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope without Zope

2007-11-16 Thread Jim Fulton
On Nov 16, 2007, at 9:07 AM, Stephan Richter wrote: On Thursday 15 November 2007, Martin Aspeli wrote: Then I tried to easy_install zope.security, but this pulled in most of Zope, including the ZODB, ZConfig and zdaemon. That's a real shame - no CA (at least not with ZCML) without having

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope without Zope

2007-11-16 Thread Chris Withers
Lennart Regebro wrote: On Nov 16, 2007 11:41 AM, Lennart Regebro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 16, 2007 3:38 AM, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Help appreciated! Well, I suggest you forget about ZCML and try to use the CA directly from Python. The Pylons people would probably

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope without Zope

2007-11-16 Thread Martin Aspeli
On Nov 16, 2007 2:07 PM, Stephan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 15 November 2007, Martin Aspeli wrote: Then I tried to easy_install zope.security, but this pulled in most of Zope, including the ZODB, ZConfig and zdaemon. That's a real shame - no CA (at least not with ZCML)

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope and zope

2004-04-15 Thread Stefan H. Holek
+0, not a problem. -1 for renaming 'Zope'. I endorse the 'src/zope' idea. Stefan On Mittwoch, Apr 14, 2004, at 15:00 Europe/Vienna, Jim Fulton wrote: Perhaps we can get more input on whether there's a problem. A response with a positive sign (e.g. +1, +0, +2, ...) indicates agreement that

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope and zope

2004-04-13 Thread Chris McDonough
+1 It looks like in the Zope 2 trunk, there are only a very few places that rely on import Zope or from Zope import. It looks like it would be possible to change the name of the Zope package in Zope 2 to zope2 or something without a tremendous amount of work. And as long as a module alias was

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2, Zope 3, now, (was funky side-effects,possible bug in HTTPRequest.py)

2003-06-20 Thread Chris McDonough
I'll quote the (seemingly late) Andrew Kenneth Milton wrt Zope 2: http://www.zope.org/Members/mcdonc/Silly/newzopelogo ;-) On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 20:35, Adrian van den Dries wrote: On June 20, Jamie Heilman wrote: and I don't like surprises Zope 2 is probably not the most suitable choice,