Re: [Zope3-dev] Bytes versus ASCII

2006-02-03 Thread Egon Frerich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gary Poster schrieb am 27.01.2006 21:40: On Jan 27, 2006, at 5:16 AM, Christian Theune wrote: Hi, (this is about zope.schema) I assumed that the fields Bytes and ASCII have some distinction. The ASCII field explicitly checks for every

[Zope3-dev] Z3 widgets overview

2006-02-03 Thread Adam Groszer
Hello, I had some time to finalize the widgets overview. You can download it from here in various formats: http://www.zope.org/Members/adamg/widget -- Best regards, Adam mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Quote of the day: A journey of a thousand miles begins with a cash

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Local Component Management Simplification

2006-02-03 Thread Martijn Faassen
Stephan Richter wrote: On Thursday 02 February 2006 11:50, Martijn Faassen wrote: or this content object (that is a site), when it's installed into the ZODB (like a CMFSite or a Silva Root), please also install the following local utilities (catalog, intid utility, etc). I have already

Re: [Zope3-dev] Z3 widgets overview

2006-02-03 Thread Dominik Huber
Adam Groszer wrote: Hello, I had some time to finalize the widgets overview. You can download it from here in various formats: http://www.zope.org/Members/adamg/widget thanks, super! dominik -- Dominik Huber Perse Engineering GmbH Jurastrasse 9a CH-5406 Baden E-Mail:

[Zope3-dev] Re: [Zope3-Users] Z3 widgets overview

2006-02-03 Thread Martijn Faassen
Adam Groszer wrote: Hello, I had some time to finalize the widgets overview. You can download it from here in various formats: http://www.zope.org/Members/adamg/widget Wow, thanks, this looks really cool! Regards, Martijn ___ Zope3-dev mailing

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Local Component Management Simplification

2006-02-03 Thread Jim Fulton
Martijn Faassen wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: I've posted a proposal to simplify local component management at: http://dev.zope.org/Zope3/LocalComponentManagementSimplification Comments and questions are welcome. I like the proposal. I'm trying to figure out what this means exactly:

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Local Component Management Simplification

2006-02-03 Thread Dominik Huber
Jim Fulton wrote: I've updated the proposed APIs. I changed wording from provide to register as unprovide doesn't make sense. (This also conglicts less with existing APIs.) I like the new wording. Do you offer the new wording within the zapi too? That would be cool. zapi.registerAdapter()

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Local Component Management Simplification

2006-02-03 Thread Dominik Huber
Jim Fulton wrote: One issue with subscribers currently is that ZCML subscriber directives can't be overridden. We need a fix for this. In my understanding this usecase is covered by the new implementation, isn't it? Regards, Dominik ___

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Local Component Management Simplification

2006-02-03 Thread Jim Fulton
Dominik Huber wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: I've updated the proposed APIs. I changed wording from provide to register as unprovide doesn't make sense. (This also conglicts less with existing APIs.) I like the new wording. Do you offer the new wording within the zapi too? I'd prefer to get

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Local Component Management Simplification

2006-02-03 Thread Jim Fulton
Dominik Huber wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: One issue with subscribers currently is that ZCML subscriber directives can't be overridden. We need a fix for this. In my understanding this usecase is covered by the new implementation, isn't it? What new implementation? Jim -- Jim Fulton

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Local Component Management Simplification

2006-02-03 Thread Dominik Huber
Jim Fulton wrote: Dominik Huber wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: I've updated the proposed APIs. I changed wording from provide to register as unprovide doesn't make sense. (This also conglicts less with existing APIs.) I like the new wording. Do you offer the new wording within the zapi too?

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Local Component Management Simplification

2006-02-03 Thread Dominik Huber
Jim Fulton wrote: Dominik Huber wrote: Jim Fulton wrote: One issue with subscribers currently is that ZCML subscriber directives can't be overridden. We need a fix for this. In my understanding this usecase is covered by the new implementation, isn't it? What new implementation? The

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Local Component Management Simplification

2006-02-03 Thread Stephan Richter
On Friday 03 February 2006 06:17, Martijn Faassen wrote: I have already demonstrated such behavior in the bugtracker package. You can use subscribers for it as well. Could you be a bit more specific on where in the bugtracker package I should be looking to find this behavior? Sure. I must

Re: [Zope3-dev] Z3 widgets overview

2006-02-03 Thread Stephan Richter
On Friday 03 February 2006 05:32, Adam Groszer wrote: I had some time to finalize the widgets overview. You can download it from here in various formats:   http://www.zope.org/Members/adamg/widget Adam, I am glad you did this overview. spanky of the Plone development team has created a

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Local Component Management Simplification

2006-02-03 Thread Stephan Richter
On Friday 03 February 2006 07:17, Jim Fulton wrote: BTW, the new adapter registries have __bases__ attributes and support multiple base registries.  The same will probably hold for component registries (that handle both adapters and utilities). So, one could have a local registry that stores

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Local Component Management Simplification

2006-02-03 Thread Stephan Richter
On Friday 03 February 2006 07:17, Jim Fulton wrote: Good point.  I'm liking your proposal.  It deserves some more thought. However, another way to do the same thing woyuld be to allow ZCML to define multiple registries and have a way of saying that a site of a particular kind should use an

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Local Component Management Simplification

2006-02-03 Thread Stephan Richter
On Friday 03 February 2006 07:06, Jim Fulton wrote: I've updated the proposed APIs. I changed wording from provide to register as unprovide doesn't make sense. (This also conglicts less with existing APIs.) Like Dominik, I like the API as well. Comments and questions are still welcome. I

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Local Component Management Simplification

2006-02-03 Thread Jim Fulton
Stephan Richter wrote: ... I just noticed that we have a slight paradigm shift here now; Subscriptions are split into subscriptions and handlers. I like that distinction, but it needs to be well-documented and communicated. I don't disagree, except to note that that split happened some time

Re: [Zope3-dev] My Experiences using Interface invariants with Formlib

2006-02-03 Thread Stephan Richter
On Wednesday 01 February 2006 08:41, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote: I built such a password + confirmation widget for the Document Library application we've been working on. It would not be difficult at all to put this in the hurry library for others to use. Or maybe it should go in Zope3's

Re: [Zope3-dev] Additional address(es) in access.log

2006-02-03 Thread Stephan Richter
On Tuesday 31 January 2006 07:06, Jim Washington wrote: Please pardon if the patch is not-quite-right.  I did not read the directions. Jim, could you make this a issue report in the Twisted collector and assign it to James Knight? Regards, Stephan -- Stephan Richter CBU Physics Chemistry

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Zope 3 Book

2006-02-03 Thread Stephan Richter
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 02:19, Mikhail Kashkin wrote: Stephan, may be it is possible to publish your book again in Wiki format, and grant rights to other authors? I put all the sources into a special repository that is sponsored by zope.org. Unfortunately, the publisher only worked with

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Zope 3 Book

2006-02-03 Thread Jim Fulton
Stephan Richter wrote: On Wednesday 25 January 2006 02:19, Mikhail Kashkin wrote: Stephan, may be it is possible to publish your book again in Wiki format, and grant rights to other authors? I put all the sources into a special repository that is sponsored by zope.org. Unfortunately, the

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Local Component Management Simplification

2006-02-03 Thread Amos Latteier
Hi, In general I like the proposal, but I have a small nit: registerSubscriptionAdapter's signature indicates that one of its arguments is adapts, but the docstring indicates that it is named required. The same thing is true with unregisterSubscriptionAdapter, registerHandler, and

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Local Component Management Simplification

2006-02-03 Thread Jim Fulton
Amos Latteier wrote: Hi, In general I like the proposal, but I have a small nit: registerSubscriptionAdapter's signature indicates that one of its arguments is adapts, but the docstring indicates that it is named required. The same thing is true with unregisterSubscriptionAdapter,

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Zope 3 Book

2006-02-03 Thread Igor Stroh
Jim Fulton wrote: Stephan Richter wrote: On Wednesday 25 January 2006 02:19, Mikhail Kashkin wrote: Stephan, may be it is possible to publish your book again in Wiki format, and grant rights to other authors? I put all the sources into a special repository that is sponsored by

[Zope3-dev] Nine new ZC Zope 3 packages

2006-02-03 Thread Gary Poster
[My apologies for spamming zope-dev; I neglected to add the 3 in the first post] Zope Corp has released nine new packages as standalone Zope 3 projects on zope.org. Three are completely new to the zope.org repository, and six were previously part of the zc Sandbox on zope.org. These

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Zope 3 Book

2006-02-03 Thread Fred Drake
On 2/3/06, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: *Or* you could admit defeat and maintain the book in an accessible format like Word or Open Office. :) There's the question of accessible to whom? here. -1 for binary formats. (Yes, I know OpenDocument docs are XML inside, but they're incredibly

Re: [Zope3-dev] Re: Zope 3 Book

2006-02-03 Thread Jim Fulton
Fred Drake wrote: On 2/3/06, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: *Or* you could admit defeat and maintain the book in an accessible format like Word or Open Office. :) There's the question of accessible to whom? here. Right. I was refering to that small subset of computer users who have

Re: [Zope3-dev] RFC: Local Component Management Simplification

2006-02-03 Thread Dieter Maurer
Stephan Richter wrote at 2006-2-3 12:45 -0500: ... declareSite name=mysite / site name=mysite / !-- normal directives here. -- /site The declareSite looks redundant. I see at the site name='mysite' element that a site with name mysite is declared... -- Dieter