as the published
object typically (being a view class).
Doesn't the published object, being a view class, have context and
request as instance variables?
object.context and object.request should work to access these things.
Or am I missing something?
-Jim Washington
I'm more concretely +1 on (a) now that I've spelled out these
options. Since no one has given a true -1 on it, I will proceed with
that, unless we get further discussion.
Thanks, Gary
I am looking forward to using some of this!
-Jim Washington
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Jim Washington wrote at 2007-3-27 16:28 -0400:
...
Yes, I think so, at least in the implementation/algorithm I am using.
There may be other implementations that do not need this. Note,
however, that the canonical list does not have to be complex objects
tests to see whether
unpacking a factoradic is significantly less expensive than re-sorting.
Intuitively, it should be. In practice, I am not so sure.
Anyway, this is FWIW. :)
-Jim Washington
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Jim Washington wrote at 2007-3-27 08:24 -0400:
...
If you see a sort order as one permutation of a list, the factoradic
technique provides a key to that permutation. So, in theory, one would
sort the list, and store the factoradic index for that permutation
with
better lxml knowledge are encouraged to point out issues with the
implementation.
-Jim Washington
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
a matter of throwing a switch on SF, so it is certainly
doable.
For the moment, the Zif Collective is all alpha and experimental on
SourceForge. Nothing released. Nothing to be alarmed about. Nothing
decided about other repositories.
-Jim Washington
Jim Washington wrote:
Still playing with Dojo. Very Nice! :)
I'm having a problem with content-type for items served from a
resourceDirectory.
In particular, one piece of dojo, a file with a .html extension begins
with ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?. The DOCTYPE says XHTML 1.0
Strict
this for now.
-Jim Washington
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
is an
iterator that is specifically not a list or tuple.
hth,
-Jim Washington
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
this is a small example of.
I recall Gary saying something about zc.resourcelibrary possibly being
wsgi-middleware-able, and that would be really cool!
And with wsgi-friendly zope2, (does zope.paste work in Five?), well, I
could go on and on and on... :)
-Jim Washington
.
-Jim Washington
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Gary Poster wrote:
On Mar 20, 2006, at 9:39 AM, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Monday 20 March 2006 09:35, Jim Washington wrote:
[...]
BTW, I would be glad to see a proposal to add this to the core. I
think httpgz
is general very interesting to a lot of people.
+1
If it goes into the core
hooks in zope.conf? Or would that be a bad idea?
-Jim Washington
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
to be updated first. I'll maybe look into that when I have time.
-Jim Washington
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
x-forwarded-for in the log (my
machines are all behind pound, and 127.0.0.1 as ip address is pretty
useless), but I found the XXX about user while I was spelunking there.
-Jim Washington
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http
jürgen Kartnaller wrote:
Without going much deeper into the way zope uses database connections.
Wouldn't MySQL:Ping solve the reconnect Problem.
That's what I used in my old C++ projects.
Some kind of ensureConnected at the right place.
Jürgen
Thanks! I'll look into it.
-Jim Washington
see consensus that zope.app.rdb is
the place to remedy this.
-Jim Washington
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
idleness, so I would
think it unlikely that one would be resuming an 8-hour-old transaction.
Could that happen?
-Jim Washington
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.org
Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Jim Washington wrote:
Florent Guillaume wrote:
Jim Washington wrote:
Spelunking a bit in the code,
zope.app.rdb.ZopeDatabaseAdapter.isConnected() looks at whether
_v_connection is present, not whether the connection is actually
alive. If we fix this here, isConnected() perhaps should
Christian Theune wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 13.12.2005, 16:32 -0500 schrieb Jim Washington:
Christian Theune wrote:
Well. First, the error would be something like an OperationalError (or
similar). Hmm. Not too distinguishable. Ideally we could:
- differentiate this kind
21 matches
Mail list logo
