Benji York wrote:
Balazs Ree wrote:
However there is nothing that would keep away a server to be aware of
currently open pages and be able to send notifications to them. This
would
also require server support for registering open connections. This
pattern
might even turn out to be so
Jeff Rush wrote:
Just checking if I'm missing something -- with the removal of HTTP
streaming/chunking in 3.2, this means that the async bi-directional
persistent socket communications associated with Ajax is NOT possible
at this time? That a request/response must quickly run to completion
Jim Fulton wrote:
out of curiosity, what are the things that make a reload not robust ?
is it just a matter of dependencies or it's deeper ?
I was hoping that someone else would answer this directly. :)
Shane did largely answer it, but I'll try to be more direct and
concise:
When you
Jim Fulton wrote:
- Look at opprtunities for limited robust reload. Perhaps we could
define reloadable modules, especially for defining adapters,
with restrictions on their definitions and exports in a way
that allows robust reload. This would probably be based on the
Hello,
it looks like 'provides' is mandatory for the 'subscriber' directive if
I need
to set a permission.
If I want to add a permission on a simple handler, it won't work:
No go:
... subscriber
... handler=my_handler
... for=IMyEvent
... permission=InYourDreams
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
Modified: Zope3/trunk/src/zope/app/file/browser/tests/test_imagedata.py
===
--- Zope3/trunk/src/zope/app/file/browser/tests/test_imagedata.py
2006-04-09 21:31:11 UTC (rev
Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
the DZUG is preparing a fair booth on the Linux Tag and we had the idea
of a marketing Zope a bit away from the standard. I'll be doing a
presentation showing off Zope 3 techniques as Dozen Dirty Tricks (even
though they might not be dirty in the real sense of the
Max M wrote:
Being a long time Product developer for Zope 2, I constantly have a
big problem with checking compatibility for my products with different
Python-Zope-Plone-Product combinations.
It is also impossible to guess from the Products on zope.org and
Plone.org which versions works
Max M wrote:
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
I think buildbot fills this need very well,
like http://buildbot.zope.org/ or http://buildbot.nuxeo.org/
I was aware of http://buildbot.zope.org/ but I though it was an
internally developed tool.
Nope, it's a python product. python-dev even use it too
Chris Withers wrote:
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
Or am I the only one seing this as a problem that should be automated?
I think buildbot fills this need very well,
like http://buildbot.zope.org/ or http://buildbot.nuxeo.org/
Nah, Max is after something different, and I agree with him
Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
I'm not sure shuffling the hype and Zope 3 marketing conversations
to zope-web is a good idea. I'm not trying to fix zope.org (eek),
and I'm not trying to improve the Zope 2 image (though that would be
nice too). I, and I think others,
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Max M wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Alternatively, we could use our energy to actually work together on
a new website instead of competing. There's a zope-web mailing list,
after all, so go and talk there. This would have my preference.
If you want to fix the Zope
are
involved (like zasync)
Also I wouldn't mind having a 'cancel' button on my form, but this is another
chapter :)
Any thoughts on this ?
Tarek
--
Tarek Ziadé | Nuxeo RD (Paris, France)
CPS Plateform : http://www.cps-project.org
mail: tziade at nuxeo.com | tel: +33 (0) 6 30 37 02 63
You
Gary Poster wrote:
On Dec 6, 2005, at 5:35 PM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
...
I have old proposals for this, and some revisions of them on the
basis of conversations with Jim, Fred, Stephan, and Benji.
...
...
I am looking forward for the proposal revision :)
Just
be able to help implement).
I have started the proposal here:
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Projects/ComponentArchitecture/PerformanceRegressionTool
Tarek.
--
Tarek Ziadé | Nuxeo RD (Paris, France)
CPS Plateform : http://www.cps-project.org
mail: tziade at nuxeo.com | tel: +33 (0) 6 30 37
could somehow size what's beeing
pickled, since it's just a buffer.
we could therefore measure the size of what's beeing serialized in a test.
that's a measure, but i wonder if it can tell something.
Tarek
--
Tarek Ziadé | Nuxeo RD (Paris, France)
CPS Plateform : http://www.cps-project.org
mail
Chris Withers wrote:
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
I think the only reliable way is to write a new python debugger.
What does pdb have to do with it?
Sorry i mistyped, i meant a python debug build, to get all objects instances
Tarek
___
Zope3-dev mailing
Benji York wrote:
Tarek Ziadé wrote:
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Projects/ComponentArchitecture/PerformanceRegressionTool
The unit test decorator looks good; I might prefer a different name
than timedtest, but because I don't write old-style unit tests I'm
just -0. The fact
Benji York wrote:
Tarek has started some very interesting work on adding performance
testing to the Zope 3 testing infrastructure and it so happens that
Jim and I were discussing something very similar last week, so I'd
like to suggest some functionality we might want to have (which I
should
Jim Fulton wrote:
[cut]
Your enhancements to check run time look very interesting,
but I think they ought to be proposed and discussed.
Please revert this change and then lets discuss what we want.
Done.
So, the main idea of the work we did last week on this topic
was to provide an easy
20 matches
Mail list logo