Jim Fulton wrote:
A while ago, we had some discussion on when to make releases and
how long to support deprecated features. The discussion has died down
so I'll summarize what I think the conclusions were:
- We'll move releases up one month to may and November from June and
December. This
On Monday 06 February 2006 06:13, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Is this stuff intended to end up in the zope core eventually? If so,
what steps will need to be taken? I imagine this also ties into the eggs
story, but the question on the zope core perhaps still stands - what
would be a dependency of
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Monday 06 February 2006 06:13, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Is this stuff intended to end up in the zope core eventually? If so,
what steps will need to be taken?
In the coming weeks I am going to be involved in this sort of discussion
hopefully on this and the plone-dev
Chris McDonough wrote:
BTW, how impending is impending? Days, weeks, months? Anybody know?
On Feb 6, 2006, at 8:40 AM, Benji York wrote:
My first thought is to consider how the impending charter of the Zope
Foundation influences things.
Good question. My response to this would be two
On Monday 06 February 2006 09:57, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Chris McDonough wrote:
BTW, how impending is impending? Days, weeks, months? Anybody know?
On Feb 6, 2006, at 8:40 AM, Benji York wrote:
My first thought is to consider how the impending charter of the Zope
Foundation
I'll keep getting Jim's agreement or putting up a proposal in mind.
As I start to think of how to extend it, I have some general question
about zope.schema. I should note that I am not currently a zope user
proper (though I will be soon), but was referred to the zope.interface
package via
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 03 February 2006 12:14, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Fri, Feb 03 17:24, Encolpe Degoute [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Zope 3 / Revolution ?
well, how about Zope3, Reloaded for all the matrix fans out there? :)
The idea of release code
On Feb 6, 2006, at 2:31 PM, Paul Winkler wrote:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 01:53:29PM -0500, Benji York wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote:
Okay, I am giving in on this. There is a three step process that
will
have to be fullfilled to assign a codename to the Zope 3.3
(apologies to Martijn and Stephan for repeating this email: zope.org
rejected my previous emails)
On Feb 6, 2006, at 6:51 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Monday 06 February 2006 06:13, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Is this stuff intended to end up in the zope core
(Apologies to Martijn for the dupe; again, zope.org rejected my
previous mail)
On Feb 6, 2006, at 6:13 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
[snip lots of cool stuff]
Great, more stuff to play with! :)
Just saw zope.file; this begs to be combined with hurry.file's
smart upload
(...sigh...apologies to Stephan...)
On Feb 6, 2006, at 6:35 AM, Stephan Richter wrote:
On Monday 06 February 2006 01:15, Brad Allen wrote:
By new website, do you mean a Zope 3 advocacy site, or a general
documentation site? Making a separate site for advocacy seems like
a no-brainer (ala
Gary Poster wrote:
Me too. Maybe even a +(0x1). Zope 3: Revolution, Zope 3:
Renaissance, and Zope 3: Rebirth were my favorites of the bunch. :-)
Well, a new name for Zope 3 sounded like such a bad idea that it didn't
even occur to me that someone would suggest it. We'd have to live with
On Feb 6, 2006, at 3:26 PM, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
Me too. Maybe even a +(0x1). Zope 3: Revolution, Zope 3:
Renaissance, and Zope 3: Rebirth were my favorites of the bunch. :-)
Well, a new name for Zope 3 sounded like such a bad idea that it
didn't even occur to me
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 17:27:43 -, Shane Hathaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 03 February 2006 12:14, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Andreas Zeidler wrote:
On Fri, Feb 03 17:24, Encolpe Degoute [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Zope 3 / Revolution ?
well, how about
Hi Florian, and other unittest gurus?
The README.txt test in zope.app.homefolder is failing (trunk).
This happens because the zope.app.file.file.File doesn't
implement IAttributeAnnotatable in the test setup.
The bad thing about this is, that the tests are running if you
run all tests at once.
Hi Gary
[...]
If desired. Pretty sure that zope.locking, zope.file (once blob
support is in), and zope.mimetype ought to go in the core.
we have a
zope.html that we'll get out soonish too (based in some TIKS
integration of FCKeditor--thanks Roger!) that we expect to be in the
IMHO, Zope 3 repository can be much smarter than Plone or other. I
think it is possible to generate some interactive documentation based on
++apidoc++ mechanics and publish it in Product area on future zope3.org.
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Monday 06 February 2006 06:13, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
However, I think one namespace for ZCML is enough.
+1
Shane
+1 from me and
+5 people around who completely stuck in ZCML
--
Mikhail Kashkin, Key Solutions (http://keysolutions.ru/)
Zope/Plone Consulting/Hosting/WebDev
Plone на
On Feb 6, 2006, at 5:37 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
[...]
This is about getting people to *understand* what Zope is about, to
understand that we *care* that they understand and that we made an
*effort* to make it easy for them to get into it. It's about
lowering the barrier to entry and the
Jim Fulton wrote:
A while ago, we had some discussion on when to make releases and
how long to support deprecated features. The discussion has died down
so I'll summarize what I think the conclusions were:
- We'll move releases up one month to may and November from June and
December.
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Friday 03 February 2006 17:23, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote at 2006-2-3 12:45 -0500:
...
declareSite name=mysite /
site name=mysite /
!-- normal directives here. --
/site
The declareSite looks redundant. I see at the site name='mysite'
element that
21 matches
Mail list logo
