Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 10:44:47AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
On May 21, 2007, at 1:39 AM, Martijn Pieters wrote:
Come again? Using the system python when developing has always been
fine;
No. It has never been fine for any aspect of development. If you
develop with your
Marius Gedminas wrote:
* distros splitting the Python profiler into a separate package due to
licencing problems, with a "helpful" stub that prints an informational
message (go apt-get install python-profiler) instead of raising
ImportError.
On this one, I raised it with the packa
Tres Seaver wrote:
- Squid3 for ESI.
Wow, you actually succeeded to get Squid3 to compile? ;-)
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
___
Zope3-dev mailing list
Zope3-dev@zope.o
Hi everyone,
I built my first Zope 3 instance with buildout yesterday. After I got an
initial version working, I found it pretty lame to use "zope.app.zcmlfiles".
With "zope.app.zcmlfiles" I had 100 eggs without it 84 eggs (this is somewhat
project-specific.)
However, I had to add several unn
On 23.05.2007, at 14:04, Stephan Richter wrote:
Hi everyone,
I built my first Zope 3 instance with buildout yesterday. After I
got an
initial version working, I found it pretty lame to use
"zope.app.zcmlfiles".
With "zope.app.zcmlfiles" I had 100 eggs without it 84 eggs (this
is somewhat
On 5/23/07, Stephan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This solution would not be fully backward-compatible with people including
package "configure.zcml" files manually. I think this is okay, since people
often do not even want the browser stuff.
That's hard to predict; some do, some don't, I
On Wednesday 23 May 2007 11:07, Fred Drake wrote:
> On 5/23/07, Stephan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This solution would not be fully backward-compatible with people
> > including package "configure.zcml" files manually. I think this is okay,
> > since people often do not even want the br
On 5/23/07, Stephan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thinking about it more, it would actually be backward-compatible, since we
never released the packages in themselves but always as part of the Zope 3
bundle. Also, even the packages that are not hooked in via zope.app.zcmlfiles
are added via
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fred Drake wrote:
> On 5/23/07, Stephan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thinking about it more, it would actually be backward-compatible, since we
>> never released the packages in themselves but always as part of the Zope 3
>> bundle. Also, even
On May 23, 2007, at 12:35 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
I don't know what is blocking a 3.4 release. AFAIK, eggification is on
the roadmap for 3.5, right? So we should be focused on stabilizing
the
"last zpkg build", while still allowing the eggified / broken-out
project model to move forward.
Th
On 5/23/07, Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmm, the use case for slugs was to support "application with separately
installed extensions"; Fred, I think your view is prejudiced by the
fact that you don't have any need for pluggability / extensibility.
Possibly so. I'm certainly not bui
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 09:37:33AM +0200, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> Marius Gedminas wrote:
> > On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 10:44:47AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
> >> On May 21, 2007, at 1:39 AM, Martijn Pieters wrote:
> >>> Come again? Using the system python when developing has always been
> >
Hi,
In schooltool, we depend on zope.wfmc and zope.app.wfmc, and we want to
make a release sometime. Unfortunately it looks like those have never
been released with zope 3 or individually.
Anyone object to me making a release of these two from the current trunk
and uploading it to http://download
On May 23, 2007, at 6:40 PM, Brian Sutherland wrote:
Hi,
In schooltool, we depend on zope.wfmc and zope.app.wfmc, and we
want to
make a release sometime. Unfortunately it looks like those have never
been released with zope 3 or individually.
Anyone object to me making a release of these tw
14 matches
Mail list logo
