On 5/23/07, Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmm, the use case for slugs was to support "application with separately installed extensions"; Fred, I think your view is prejudiced by the fact that you don't have any need for pluggability / extensibility.
Possibly so. I'm certainly not building apps where "drop-in" extensibility is as helpful as others are.
Stephan is arguing for finer-grained configurations, which is likely to be better for reuse, at the cost of *reduced* convenience.
Yes, and that's fine for me. What I consider an issue is that changing the semantics of <include package="zope.foo.package"/> is a change to the package's public interface. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at gmail.com> "Chaos is the score upon which reality is written." --Henry Miller _______________________________________________ Zope3-dev mailing list Zope3-dev@zope.org Unsub: http://mail.zope.org/mailman/options/zope3-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
