On 5/23/07, Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmm, the use case for slugs was to support "application with separately
installed extensions"; Fred, I think your view is prejudiced by the
fact that you don't have any need for pluggability / extensibility.
Possibly so. I'm certainly not building apps where "drop-in"
extensibility is as helpful as others are.
Stephan is arguing for finer-grained configurations, which is likely to
be better for reuse, at the cost of *reduced* convenience.
Yes, and that's fine for me. What I consider an issue is that
changing the semantics of
is a change to the package's public interface.
Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at gmail.com>
"Chaos is the score upon which reality is written." --Henry Miller
Zope3-dev mailing list