serviceability-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8355211: nsk/jdi/EventRequest/disable/disable001.java should use JDIBase superclass [v2] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8355211: nsk/jdi/EventRequest/disable/disable001.java should use JDIBase superclass [v2] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8355211: nsk/jdi/EventRequest/disable/disable001.java should use JDIBase superclass [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Integrated: 8355211: nsk/jdi/EventRequest/disable/disable001.java should use JDIBase superclass Chris Plummer
• Integrated: 8355071: Fix nsk/jdi test to not require lookup of main thread in order to set the breakpoint used for communication Chris Plummer
• Re: RFR: 8355071: Fix nsk/jdi test to not require lookup of main thread in order to set the breakpoint used for communication [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8355071: Fix nsk/jdi test to not require lookup of main thread in order to set the breakpoint used for communication [v3] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8355071: Fix nsk/jdi test to not require lookup of main thread in order to set the breakpoint used for communication [v3] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8355071: Fix nsk/jdi test to not require lookup of main thread in order to set the breakpoint used for communication [v3] Chris Plummer
• Re: RFR: 8355071: Fix nsk/jdi test to not require lookup of main thread in order to set the breakpoint used for communication [v2] Chris Plummer
• Re: RFR: 8355071: Fix nsk/jdi test to not require lookup of main thread in order to set the breakpoint used for communication Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8355071: Fix nsk/jdi test to not require lookup of main thread in order to set the breakpoint used for communication [v2] Chris Plummer
• RFR: 8354920: SA core file support on Linux only prints error messages when debug logging is enabled Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8354920: SA core file support on Linux only prints error messages when debug logging is enabled Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8354920: SA core file support on Linux only prints error messages when debug logging is enabled [v2] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8354920: SA core file support on Linux only prints error messages when debug logging is enabled [v2] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8354920: SA core file support on Linux only prints error messages when debug logging is enabled [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8354920: SA core file support on Linux only prints error messages when debug logging is enabled [v2] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8354920: SA core file support on Linux only prints error messages when debug logging is enabled [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8354920: SA core file support on Linux only prints error messages when debug logging is enabled [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8354920: SA core file support on Linux only prints error messages when debug logging is enabled [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8354920: SA core file support on Linux only prints error messages when debug logging is enabled [v2] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8354920: SA core file support on Linux only prints error messages when debug logging is enabled [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8354920: SA core file support on Linux only prints error messages when debug logging is enabled [v2] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8354920: SA core file support on Linux only prints error messages when debug logging is enabled [v2] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8354920: SA core file support on Linux only prints error messages when debug logging is enabled [v3] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8354920: SA core file support on Linux only prints error messages when debug logging is enabled [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8354920: SA core file support on Linux only prints error messages when debug logging is enabled [v3] Kevin Walls
  • Re: RFR: 8354920: SA core file support on Linux only prints error messages when debug logging is enabled [v3] Daniel Jeliński
  • Integrated: 8354920: SA core file support on Linux only prints error messages when debug logging is enabled Daniel Jeliński
• RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v2] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v2] Radim Vansa
  • Withdrawn: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields Radim Vansa
  • RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v2] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v3] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v3] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v3] Frederic Parain
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v3] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v3] Frederic Parain
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v3] Frederic Parain
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v3] Frederic Parain
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v3] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v3] Frederic Parain
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v3] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v3] John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v3] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v3] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v3] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v3] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v3] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v3] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v3] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v3] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v4] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v4] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v4] Hannes Greule
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v4] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v4] Hannes Greule
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v4] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v4] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v4] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v4] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v4] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v4] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v4] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v4] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v4] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v4] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v4] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v4] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v4] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v4] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v4] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v4] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v4] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v4] Hannes Greule
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v4] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v4] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v5] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v5] John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v5] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v5] John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v5] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v5] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v5] John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v5] John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v6] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v7] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v7] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v8] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v8] John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v8] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v8] John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v8] John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v8] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v8] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v9] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v9] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v10] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v12] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v11] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v14] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v14] Coleen Phillimore
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v13] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v15] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v15] Radim Vansa
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v15] John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8352075: Perf regression accessing fields [v15] Coleen Phillimore
• RFR: 8354461: Update tests to disable streaming output for attach tools Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8354461: Update tests to disable streaming output for attach tools Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8354461: Update tests to disable streaming output for attach tools Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8354461: Update tests to disable streaming output for attach tools Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8354461: Update tests to disable streaming output for attach tools Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8354461: Update tests to disable streaming output for attach tools Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8354461: Update tests to disable streaming output for attach tools Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8354461: Update tests to disable streaming output for attach tools Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8354461: Update tests to disable streaming output for attach tools Chris Plummer
  • Integrated: 8354461: Update tests to disable streaming output for attach tools Alex Menkov
• RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v2] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v2] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v4] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v4] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v4] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v5] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v6] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v7] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v7] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v8] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v8] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v8] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v8] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v9] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v9] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v9] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v10] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v10] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v10] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v10] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v10] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v10] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v10] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v10] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v10] Leonid Mesnik
  • Re: RFR: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v10] Chris Plummer
  • Integrated: 8353955: nsk/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y Chris Plummer
• RFR: 8353953: con/sun/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8353953: con/sun/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8353953: con/sun/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v2] Hendrik Schick
  • Re: RFR: 8353953: con/sun/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v2] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8353953: con/sun/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8353953: con/sun/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8353953: con/sun/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Re: RFR: 8353953: con/sun/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v3] Alex Menkov
  • Re: RFR: 8353953: con/sun/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v3] Serguei Spitsyn
  • Re: RFR: 8353953: con/sun/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y [v3] Chris Plummer
  • Integrated: 8353953: con/sun/jdi tests should be fixed to not always require includevirtualthreads=y Chris Plummer
• RFR: 8351927: Change VirtualThread implementation to use use FJP delayed task handling Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8351927: Change VirtualThread implementation to use use FJP delayed task handling Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8351927: Change VirtualThread implementation to use use FJP delayed task handling Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8351927: Change VirtualThread implementation to use use FJP delayed task handling Viktor Klang
  • Re: RFR: 8351927: Change VirtualThread implementation to use use FJP delayed task handling Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8351927: Change VirtualThread implementation to use use FJP delayed task handling Viktor Klang
  • Integrated: 8351927: Change VirtualThread implementation to use use FJP delayed task handling Alan Bateman
• Re: RFR: 8301991: Convert l10n properties resource bundles to UTF-8 native [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8301991: Convert l10n properties resource bundles to UTF-8 native [v2] Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8301991: Convert l10n properties resource bundles to UTF-8 native [v2] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8301991: Convert l10n properties resource bundles to UTF-8 native [v2] Magnus Ihse Bursie
• Re: RFR: 8301991: Convert l10n properties resource bundles to UTF-8 native [v6] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8301991: Convert l10n properties resource bundles to UTF-8 native [v6] Justin Lu
  • Re: RFR: 8301991: Convert l10n properties resource bundles to UTF-8 native [v6] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8301991: Convert l10n properties resource bundles to UTF-8 native [v6] Magnus Ihse Bursie
  • Re: RFR: 8301991: Convert l10n properties resource bundles to UTF-8 native [v6] Eirik Bjørsnøs
  • Re: RFR: 8301991: Convert l10n properties resource bundles to UTF-8 native [v6] Magnus Ihse Bursie
• RFR: 8350441: ZGC: Overhaul Page Allocation Joel Sikström
  • Re: RFR: 8350441: ZGC: Overhaul Page Allocation Axel Boldt-Christmas
  • Re: RFR: 8350441: ZGC: Overhaul Page Allocation [v2] Joel Sikström
  • Re: RFR: 8350441: ZGC: Overhaul Page Allocation [v2] Axel Boldt-Christmas
  • Re: RFR: 8350441: ZGC: Overhaul Page Allocation [v2] Erik Österlund
  • Re: RFR: 8350441: ZGC: Overhaul Page Allocation [v2] Joel Sikström
  • Re: RFR: 8350441: ZGC: Overhaul Page Allocation [v2] Stefan Karlsson
  • Integrated: 8350441: ZGC: Overhaul Page Allocation Joel Sikström
• RFR: 8353938: hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/dcmd/jvmti/LoadAgentDcmdTest.java fails on static JDK Jiangli Zhou
  • Re: RFR: 8353938: hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/dcmd/jvmti/LoadAgentDcmdTest.java fails on static JDK Jiangli Zhou
  • Re: RFR: 8353938: hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/dcmd/jvmti/LoadAgentDcmdTest.java fails on static JDK [v2] Jiangli Zhou
  • Re: RFR: 8353938: hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/dcmd/jvmti/LoadAgentDcmdTest.java fails on static JDK [v2] Jiangli Zhou

• Earlier messages
• Later messages