Hello all, I agreed that APNIC should accept all transfer without question because IP resource could be count into a assets to the IP holder in accounting. That's mean the ip holder have the right to request transfer to or from other APNIC members or other RIR.
Ernest Tse Sent from Mobile > David Hilario <[email protected]> 於 2017年2月24日 22:04 寫道： > > > > Hi Aftab, > > This is only to simplify things, need based policies are there to protect the > free pool from exhaustion and ensure fair distribution. > > Space that is already out there can already be transferred without much > hassle, removing the need base justification just simplifies the whole > process, making the transfer faster and smoother. > > > David Hilario > > IP Manager > > Larus Cloud Service Limited > > p: +852 29888918 m: +359 89 764 1784 > f: +852 29888068 > a: Flat B5, 11/F, TML Tower, No.3 Hoi Shing Road, Tsuen Wan, HKSAR > w: laruscloudservice.net/uk > e: [email protected] > > >> On 22 February 2017 at 10:04, Aftab Siddiqui <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> Thanks Guangliang for the update. >> >> Hi David, what are we trying to fix? >> >>> On Wed, 22 Feb 2017 at 14:13 Guangliang Pan <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi Aftab, >>> >>> >>> >>> We don't have a case that rejected because the recipient could not >>> demonstrate need. However, during the evaluation process, APNIC Hostmasters >>> often ask for more support documents before approve large transfers. >>> >>> >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> >>> >>> >>> Guangliang >>> >>> ========== >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Aftab Siddiqui [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: Wednesday, 22 February 2017 12:23 AM >>> To: David Hilario; Guangliang Pan >>> Cc: [email protected] >>> >>> >>> Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-118-v001: No need policy in APNIC region >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi Guangliang, >>> >>> Do you have any stats on rejection rate due to weak requirement >>> justifications? >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 at 18:34 David Hilario >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Dear Benny, >>> >>> >>> >>> Thank you for asking for clarifications. >>> >>> >>> >>> This proposal is for any transfer, within in or out of region. >>> >>> >>> >>> The need based part is only needed to match any registry requiring a need >>> based justification, this can be another RIR or even an NIR. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> David Hilario >>> >>> IP Manager >>> >>> Larus Cloud Service Limited >>> >>> p: +852 29888918 m: +359 89 764 1784 >>> f: +852 29888068 >>> a: Flat B5, 11/F, TML Tower, No.3 Hoi Shing Road, Tsuen Wan, HKSAR >>> w: laruscloudservice.net/uk >>> e: [email protected] >>> >>> >>> >>> On 21 February 2017 at 05:38, Guangliang Pan <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Dear David, >>> >>> >>> >>> From implementation point of view, I would like to double check if the >>> following proposal will also apply to transfers within the APNIC region. >>> >>> >>> >>> - APNIC shall accept all transfers of Internet number resources to its >>> >>> service region, provided that they comply with the policies relating >>> >>> to transfers within its service region. >>> >>> >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> >>> >>> Guangliang Pan (Benny) >>> >>> Registration Services Manager, APNIC >>> >>> Email: [email protected] >>> >>> SIP: [email protected] >>> >>> Phone: +61 7 3858 3188 >>> >>> http://www.apnic.net >>> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> * You can now call APNIC Helpdesk for free using Skype. For more information >>> >>> visit: www.apnic.net/helpdesk >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: [email protected] >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Hilario >>> Sent: Friday, 17 February 2017 12:17 AM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-118-v001: No need policy in APNIC region >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Dear list, >>> >>> >>> >>> We are only a few days away from the meeting in Saigon. >>> >>> There has been no opposition to the policy, but only very little support as >>> well. >>> >>> >>> >>> As the proposer of this policy I would like to know if there is interest in >>> streamlining the policy a bit in order to make transfers between two >>> regions more compatible, it is really more of a small patch the way I see >>> it. >>> >>> >>> >>> Any opposition to it is very much welcome too, only the "positive" sides >>> were really investigated and I would gladly hear any opposition to it as >>> well as any support. >>> >>> >>> >>> David Hilario >>> >>> IP Manager >>> >>> Larus Cloud Service Limited >>> >>> p: +852 29888918 m: +359 89 764 1784 >>> f: +852 29888068 >>> a: Flat B5, 11/F, TML Tower, No.3 Hoi Shing Road, Tsuen Wan, HKSAR >>> w: laruscloudservice.net/uk >>> e: [email protected] >>> >>> >>> >>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy >>> * >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sig-policy mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Best Wishes, >>> >>> >>> >>> Aftab A. Siddiqui >>> >> >> -- >> Best Wishes, >> >> Aftab A. Siddiqui > > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy > * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
