Thanks Paul,

This addresses all my concerns.

Regards,

Aftab A. Siddiqui


On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 1:51 PM Paul Wilson <pwil...@apnic.net> wrote:

> Dear Sumon and all,
>
> To reduce confusion over ISP/LIR/etc terminology, perhaps the charter
> could be stated more simply, along these lines:
>
> “The Policy SIG charter is to develop policies which relate to the
> management and use of Internet address resources within the Asia Pacific
> region. …”
>
> My 2c, with best regards,
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC d...@apnic.net
> http://www.apnic.net @apnicdg
>
> On 9 May 2019, at 19:53, Sumon Ahmed Sabir wrote:
>
>
> Thank you very much Aftab and Owen for your constructive feedback. We will
> definitely consider those views.
>
> If any one has any different perspective please jump in and share
> your thoughts.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Sumon
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 10:52 AM Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote:
>
>> Aftab, I think you misread the proposed language.
>>
>> First, neither the current version nor the proposed version refer to
>> members at all, but to the actions of the APNIC, NIRs, and ISPs. The one
>> change I think should be made there is to replace ISPs with LIRs since not
>> all LIRs are technically ISPs, though that is certainly the most common
>> case.
>>
>> As to your “not limited to” or “services related to resources”, I fail to
>> see how that is not addressed by the proposed “…and related services”.
>>
>> I support the language proposed by Sumon whether or not he chooses to
>> take my NIR suggestion.
>>
>> Owen
>>
>>
>> On May 5, 2019, at 03:21 , Aftab Siddiqui <aftab.siddi...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Sumon bhai for the initiative,
>>
>> <nitpik>
>> Revised text suggest that all members/resource holders in APNIC are ISPs
>> only, I would suggest to make it "APNIC and NIR members or resource holders
>> in Asia Pacific region". Because not all members are resource holders.
>>
>> Secondly, when you start mentioning topics in the charter then it may
>> create confusion moving forward that only these topics can be covered so
>> how about adding "not limited to" or "services related to resources" or
>> something like that.
>> </nitpik>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Aftab A. Siddiqui
>>
>>
>> On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 4:31 PM Sumon Ahmed Sabir <sasa...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Members,
>>>
>>> In the last APNIC meeting in Daejoan there was a discussion that there
>>> is a perception
>>> That Policy SIG discusses only about “Address Policy”. On the other hand
>>> there is a understanding
>>> that Policy SIG covers a wider range of registry issues, RPKI or any
>>> other topics that requires a
>>> procedures and rules.
>>>
>>> To avoid confusion and to bring clarity in the Policy Charter few
>>> proposals came in. That either we can change the Name of the Policy SIG
>>> to cover wider range or to amend the Policy-SIG Charter to bring clarity
>>> about the scope of Policy SIG.
>>>
>>> After discussions chairs feels that we can make some changes in the SIG
>>> Charter to bring clarity:
>>>
>>>
>>> Current SIG Charter https://www.apnic.net/community/policy/policy-sig/
>>>  says:
>>>
>>>
>>> ‘The Policy SIG charter is to develop policies and procedures
>>> which relate to the management and
>>> use of Internet address resources by APNIC, NIRs, and ISPs within the
>>> Asia Pacific region.”
>>>
>>> And here is the possible changes proposed:
>>>
>>>  “The Policy SIG charter is to develop policies which relate to
>>> the management and use of Internet  address resources by APNIC, NIRs,
>>> and ISPs within the Asia Pacific region.  These include policies for
>>> resource allocation, recovery and transfer, and for resource registration
>>> within whois, reverse DNS, RPKI and related services.”
>>>
>>> Please share your views, comments or suggestions in this regard.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Sumon, Bertrand and Ching-Heng
>>> Chairs, Policy-SIG
>>> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy
>>>      *
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> sig-policy mailing list
>>> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
>>> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>>
>> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy
>>           *
>> _______________________________________________
>> sig-policy mailing list
>> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
>> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>>
>>
>> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
>
> *              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy
>    *
> _______________________________________________
> sig-policy mailing list
> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
*              sig-policy:  APNIC SIG on resource management policy           *
_______________________________________________
sig-policy mailing list
sig-policy@lists.apnic.net
https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy

Reply via email to