Works for me. Owen
> On May 9, 2019, at 20:50 , Paul Wilson <pwil...@apnic.net> wrote: > > Dear Sumon and all, > > To reduce confusion over ISP/LIR/etc terminology, perhaps the charter could > be stated more simply, along these lines: > > “The Policy SIG charter is to develop policies which relate to the management > and use of Internet address resources within the Asia Pacific region. …” > > > My 2c, with best regards, > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC d...@apnic.net > http://www.apnic.net <http://www.apnic.net/> @apnicdg > > On 9 May 2019, at 19:53, Sumon Ahmed Sabir wrote: > > > Thank you very much Aftab and Owen for your constructive feedback. We will > definitely consider those views. > > If any one has any different perspective please jump in and share your > thoughts. > > Sincerely, > > Sumon > > > > On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 10:52 AM Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com > <mailto:o...@delong.com>> wrote: > Aftab, I think you misread the proposed language. > > First, neither the current version nor the proposed version refer to members > at all, but to the actions of the APNIC, NIRs, and ISPs. The one change I > think should be made there is to replace ISPs with LIRs since not all LIRs > are technically ISPs, though that is certainly the most common case. > > As to your “not limited to” or “services related to resources”, I fail to see > how that is not addressed by the proposed “…and related services”. > > I support the language proposed by Sumon whether or not he chooses to take my > NIR suggestion. > > Owen > > >> On May 5, 2019, at 03:21 , Aftab Siddiqui <aftab.siddi...@gmail.com >> <mailto:aftab.siddi...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Thanks Sumon bhai for the initiative, >> >> <nitpik> >> Revised text suggest that all members/resource holders in APNIC are ISPs >> only, I would suggest to make it "APNIC and NIR members or resource holders >> in Asia Pacific region". Because not all members are resource holders. >> >> Secondly, when you start mentioning topics in the charter then it may create >> confusion moving forward that only these topics can be covered so how about >> adding "not limited to" or "services related to resources" or something like >> that. >> </nitpik> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Aftab A. Siddiqui >> >> >> On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 4:31 PM Sumon Ahmed Sabir <sasa...@gmail.com >> <mailto:sasa...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> Dear Members, >> >> In the last APNIC meeting in Daejoan there was a discussion that there is a >> perception >> That Policy SIG discusses only about “Address Policy”. On the other hand >> there is a understanding >> that Policy SIG covers a wider range of registry issues, RPKI or any other >> topics that requires a >> procedures and rules. >> >> To avoid confusion and to bring clarity in the Policy Charter few proposals >> came in. That either we can change the Name of the Policy SIG to cover wider >> range or to amend the Policy-SIG Charter to bring clarity about the scope of >> Policy SIG. >> >> After discussions chairs feels that we can make some changes in the SIG >> Charter to bring clarity: >> >> >> Current SIG Charter https://www.apnic.net/community/policy/policy-sig/ >> <https://www.apnic.net/community/policy/policy-sig/> says: >> >> >> ‘The Policy SIG charter is to develop policies and procedures which relate >> to the management and >> use of Internet address resources by APNIC, NIRs, and ISPs within the Asia >> Pacific region.” >> >> And here is the possible changes proposed: >> >> “The Policy SIG charter is to develop policies which relate to the >> management and use of Internet address resources by APNIC, NIRs, and ISPs >> within the Asia Pacific region. These include policies for resource >> allocation, recovery and transfer, and for resource registration within >> whois, reverse DNS, RPKI and related services.” >> >> Please share your views, comments or suggestions in this regard. >> >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Sumon, Bertrand and Ching-Heng >> Chairs, Policy-SIG >> * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy >> * >> _______________________________________________ >> sig-policy mailing list >> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net> >> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy >> <https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>* >> sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * >> _______________________________________________ >> sig-policy mailing list >> sig-policy@lists.apnic.net <mailto:sig-policy@lists.apnic.net> >> https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy >> <https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy> > * sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * > _______________________________________________ > sig-policy mailing list > sig-policy@lists.apnic.net > https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy > <https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy>
* sig-policy: APNIC SIG on resource management policy * _______________________________________________ sig-policy mailing list sig-policy@lists.apnic.net https://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy
