On Wednesday 20 Apr 2011 9:39:31 am Heather Madrone wrote:
> Yes, an ad hominem attack with a hearty dollop of psychologizing is 
> certainly a persuasive argument.
> 
> Now, if you would care to tell me what in particular is wrong about 
> Robert Lustig's description of glucose and fructose metabolism, I would 
> love to replace his ignorant ideas with your far better informed ones.
> 

Pass. 

You win. 

shiv

Reply via email to