"PTFerrance" <[email protected]> wrote: > >What I don't understand, Mike, is how everyone that contributes to this list >seems to be doing just fine on the CS they make for at least as long as I >have been on the list. Now you come along and tell people they are doing >everything wrong and can't possibly be getting what they say they are >getting. What is your point? They are demonstrating that *whatever* they >are doing it is working for them. >PT
PT, There have been many reports that the cs people make does not work. They are buried in the archives. I produced an example that shows a weak silver ion concentration does not awlays work. Sol said the same thing. The number of people who have tried to make cs and ran into problems is very large. There are serious problems with contamination, which nobody else besides me has addressed. I show that moving to borsilicate glass greatly reduces the problem of leaching, and I show how to desulfurize the electrodes to reduce the contamination from silver sulfide. I show that Hanna and COM-100 readings are essentially meaningless until they are verified. There are two simple ways to do this. One uses the Faraday calculation to compare the amount of silver liberated from the anode with the resulting silver ion concentration in the solution. The second method is to use the Salt Test to compare the ion concentration in the brew with a known concentration, perhaps from diluting a known concentration of silver nitrate. I show that a high ion concentration is very suitable for sublingual absorption. This eliminates any concern for Argyria, elmininates and problem with harming the bacteria in the large intestine, greatly reduces the amount of distilled water that is needed, reduces the amount of silver used by a significant amount, and assures a known, repeatable dosage. It also eliminates the bacteria that cause dental cavities and gum disease, and helps reduce your dental bills. It also may help eliminate halitosis. I have not discussed Helicobacter Pylori, the bacteria that causes stomach ulcers. This is extremely difficult to treat, and usually requires a coctail of several different antibiotics taken over the period of three weeks. This does not always work, and a second treatment may be required, with an additional antibiotic added to the mix. Stomach ulcers are extremely painful. I had this infection, and a single glass of high-ionic cs took care of the problem in about 6 hours. Existing cs generators may run from about $150 to over $600. I am in the process of showing how to make your own SilverCell for basically the cost of the silver electrodes. The SilverCell process also lends itself to accurate monitoring without the need for expensive instruments, such as a Hanna or COM-100. It is remarkably tolerant of errors due to inattention, such as when a busy single mom is making dinner and cannot monitor the system. It will not run away like a 3 nines and result in mud that you have to throw away. The SilverCell process is remarkably insensitive to the quality of the dw. It will work fine with any dw that measures from 0.3uS to about 2.6uS. So you do not need expensive distillers to supply the dw. The SilverCell process does not generate any silver hydroxide, AgOH. There is no Tyndall. It will not turn yellow. So you do not need to fuss with food grade H2O2 to try to turn the solution clear. These are just some of the advantages from the top of my head. They cannot be matched by any existing system. No, I most definitely am not stating everyone is doing it wrong, except perhaps with respect to ignoring contamination problems and not verifying the results of their brew with a Faraday calculation and the Salt Test. Aside from that, if you are happy with your current method, why change? But if you happen to run into an infection that your current system cannot handle, I offer a simple approach to greatly increase the strength of your brew. In fact, if you have made your own cs generator and wish to improve the performance, you can apply the principles I teach to your own system at very little cost, and greatly improve the performance. All it takes is an understanding of how silver electrolysis works, and how to get around the problem of silver and hydroxide ions combining in the Nernst Diffusion layer and forming silver hydroxide, AgOH. The solution is to reduce the current concentration so it is below the Nernst Threshold, and to form gradual bends in the U-shape of the electrodes so it does not concentrate the field and increase the current density so it is locally above the Nernst Threshold. This is a very simple change to the process, and can increase the resulting silver ion concentration by about a factor of ten over the original 3 nines. Yet it is less expensive than a 3 nines since it only requires a single 9 volt battery instead of three or four. So yes, there definitely is a better way to make cs. It is cheap, reliable, and cannot be matched by existing methods. I give the information for free, and will donate the entire process to the public domain so nobody can patent it and prevent others from using it. Is there any other thing you would wish for? Thanks, Mike Monett SilverCell -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:[email protected]> List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:[email protected]>
