Yes, I think so; but perhaps not always quite so quick and easy. Some
experiments involve many steps, many different paths are explored. Also,
the question I wanted to shine some light on was; does the simple test
which shows success mean that the more complex one is bound to fail? I
think not.
Take care, Malcolm
At 04:38 PM 3/2/03 -0700, you wrote:
My understanding that petrie dish was quick easy way to test effect only. A
first step.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Malcolm Stebbins" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: CS>Anthrax Comment - mesosilver
> Hi Catherine;
> Regarding the phrases: ("...but it
> >has nothing what so ever to do with how it will behave inside the human
> >body. All such studies fail to ever mention that fact,...")
>
> What, then, is the point of even making Petrie dishes, much less making
the
> hundreds of thousands of researches within the medical field alone which
> employ petrie dish experiments to explore the possible outcomes of various
> hypotheses?
> Should Petrie dishes be sold only to non-medical users?
> Are all these researchers deceitful, or only those exploring the medical
> applications of various forms of finely divided silver? Is the deceit
> contained in the lack of specificity which the colloidal silver
researchers
> exhibit in presenting their clearly labelled in vitro experiments, or is
it
> contained in the implication that they fail to specifically state (in
> contrast to the more relaxed requirements imposed on the rest of the
> medical research community) That THEIR research is of course totally
> inapplicable to any immediate human therapeautic concerns? Would THAT
> statement be more accurate, or just more consonant with Mr. Key's agenda?
> Perhaps, rather, the deceit is to be found in the rhetoric of Mr. Key's
> categorically emphatic remarks: "...nothing what so ever ..." and: "All
> such studies fail to ever mention that fact ..."
> Let's proceed to the next statement, directly following the above: ("...
> and in fact leave the
> >reader with the false impression that it would work just as well inside
the
> >body. Nothing could be farther from the truth.")
> Which readers are left with what false impression? Well, I'll coin the
> phrase; "All the world are fools, excepting thee and me, and I sometimes
> have my doubts about thee."
> If you find this offensive and demeaning, consider how the rest of "...the
> reader[s] ..." might also feel, and quite justifiably so.
> Before I leave the rhetorical quagmire of Mr. Key's statement, I'd invite
> you to comment on his remark that: "Nothing could be farther from the
> truth...," in the context of the studies referred to, rather than the
> context of Mr. Key's evaluation of all us readers' intellectual
> ineptitude. In other words, do the in vitro studies indicating the high
> efficacy of ionic and/or colloidal silver in Petrie dishes really
establish
> their total, categorical inapplicability to conditions of human
> disease? That would indeed turn the research community on it's collective
> head!
> You may find Mr. Key to be an honest, helpful and dedicated person in his
> response to your queries, and indeed he may well be, but his rhetoric
> SUCKS!! That flaw, if no other, calls ALL of his remarks into serious
doubt.
> My concern here is not to use your posts as once-removed springboards to
> attack Mr. Key's, rather I am dismayed that someone with your high
> dedication and great research capacity would endorse, and thus give
> greater weight to, such self-serving cant.
> Take care, Malcolm
>
> At 06:44 AM 3/2/03 -0800, you wrote:
>
> >Dear Malcolm,
> >
> >
> > You said:
> >
> ><<Hi Catherine, I think it would be worthwhile for you to clarify and
> >delimit
> >your blanket approval of "this" to one or several of the statements
and/or
> >dependent implications Frank Key makes in the first paragraph you quoted;
> >you can nit-pick it as well as I, the first three sentences alone...>>
> >
> >
> > ** This is the statement to which I was referring:
> >
> > >Killing power of ionic silver in a Petri dish may be interesting but it
> > >has nothing what so ever to do with how it will behave inside the human
> > >body. All such studies fail to ever mention that fact, and in fact
leave
> >the
> > >reader with the false impression that it would work just as well inside
the
> > >body. Nothing could be farther from the truth.
> >
> >
> >Regards,
> >Catherine
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.445 / Virus Database: 250 - Release Date: 1/21/03
>
--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.445 / Virus Database: 250 - Release Date: 1/21/03
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.445 / Virus Database: 250 - Release Date: 1/21/03
