Oops!
Just read Malcolm's reply to Frank's ISE test description and Frank's
reply to that.
Should have read all my pile up before writing.

Ivan.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ivan Anderson [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 5 March 2003 11:12 p.m.
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: CS>Particle vs Ionic - ISE measurement
>
>
> The adult male has 5 -6 litres of blood circulating throughout the
> body, an adult female 4 - 5 litres. 250ml of 20ppm ionic CS when
> diluted by 5 litres of blood will have a concentration of 1ppm given
> the unlikely event of 100% absorption. One should suppose that ionic
> silver will also react with various constituents of the blood plasma
> to some degree, so there is not much of a margin (if any) if one can
> read only to 0.4ppm. Many Ion Selective Electrodes will not read
> correctly in the presence of Sulphides or Sulphates, both
> of which are
> present in blood plasma. Does Sodium Heparin react with silver ions?
>
> I don't think this test is reliable.
> Ivan.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Frank Key [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Monday, 3 March 2003 3:51 a.m.
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: CS>Anthrax Comment - mesosilver
> >
> >
> > Malcolm wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Catherine, I think it would be worthwhile for you to
> > clarify and
> > delimit
> > > your blanket approval of "this" to one or several of the
> > statements and/or
> > > dependent implications Frank Key makes in the first
> > paragraph you quoted;
> > > you can nit-pick it as well as I, the first three
> > sentences alone (not in
> > > isolation,  but merely) are a minefield of invalid assertion and
> > implication.
> > > Further, I am curious as to the validity of whatever
> > tests were done to
> > > show the presence or absence of  silver ions in the
> > bloodstream: where in
> > > the bloodstream, after what period of time, detected by
> > what methodology
> > of
> > > what sensitivity, after how long a period of rest or
> > analysis of the
> > > sample, replicated or not, peer reviewed or not.
> >
> > Silver ions in blood can be measured using an Ion Selective
> > Electrode (ISE)
> > for silver along with an ISE meter.
> >
> > * Blood is drawn from the subject using an 18 gauge
> > Vacutainer needle taken
> > from the antecubital space (inside of the elbow) into 10 mL
> > vacuum vials.
> > The Vacutainer vials contain sodium heparin as an anticoagulant.
> > * Blood is drawn before ingestion of ionic silver to get
> a baseline
> > (background) reading.
> > * Subject then ingests 250 mL of ionic silver solution at a
> > concentration of
> > 20 ppm.
> > * After ingestion draw blood samples at 30 minute intervals
> > for four hours.
> > * ISE silver electrode has a minimum detection limit of
> > about 0.4 ppm.
> >
> > Process the blood sample as follows:
> >
> > 1. Draw 10 mL blood sample using a Vacutainer with heparin.
> > 2. Separate the red/white cells from the blood serum by
> > centrifugation.
> > 3. Test the serum using the ISE.
> >
> > Reading on ISE over several hours do not change measurable
> > above background.
> >
> > Note: The ISE will only detect the presence of silver ions,
> > not silver
> > compounds or silver particles.
> >
> > frank key
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >Further, what is the
> > > record on the presence of silver compounds such as the
> > much maligned
> > silver
> > > chloride following ionic silver injection into the blood
> > stream, or other
> > > tissues, and so on.  Perhaps Frank can cast some light on
> > these questions
> > > for you and me in his proof of the deceitfulness of petri dish
> > > research(ers), perhaps not.
> > > After all, there is the well documented work of Dr. R.O.
> > Becker who
> > > introduced ionic silver directly into tissues to
> > eliminate bacterial
> > > infections, did it simply turn into silver chloride, and
> > everyone forgot
> > to
> > > mention that, or is the sea of other fluids of our body
> > so drastically
> > > deficient in their hungry chloride ion concentration?
> > > What about  Argentum Medical corporation's work with both
> > metallic and
> > > ionic "colloidal" silver?  The much maligned petri dish
> > evidence was used
> > > by them in their development of eminently successful in
> > vivo therapies for
> > > which they have acquired FDA approval as well as patents;
> > just a fluke of
> > > luck for bumbling fools, or are they perhaps deliberately
> > misleading
> > > themselves as well as all of us? I think not.  The record
> > speaks well for
> > > the beneficial effects of ionic "colloidal" silver in
> > vivo, blood-borne or
> > > otherwise, and for the use of in vitro research
> > protocols.  The same
> > cannot
> > > be said for Mr. Key's rhetorical flamboyance.
> > > Take care, Malcolm
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > At 07:59 PM 3/1/03 -0800, you wrote:
> > >
> > > >Frank said:
> > > >
> > > ><<Killing power of ionic silver in a Petri dish may be
> > interesting but it
> > > >has nothing what so ever to do with how it will behave
> > inside the human
> > > >body. All such studies fail to ever mention that fact,
> > and in fact leave
> > the
> > > >reader with the false impression that it would work just
> > as well inside
> > the
> > > >body. Nothing could be farther from the truth. If the
> > studies were
> > intended
> > > >to be an honest representation of how ionic silver can
> > kill pathogens in
> > the
> > > >body, the environment of the Petri dish would have to
> > simulate conditions
> > in
> > > >the body. Without the chloride being present their in the test
> > environment,
> > > >the test is scientifically flawed and misleading in
> the extreme>>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >**  I have to agree with Frank on this.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >   I'm a big fan of and advocate for CS.  But I think
> > that each time
> > claims
> > > >are made that are unfounded the more ammunition we give
> > to those who wish
> > to
> > > >shut down the CS business.
> > > >
> > > >    I'm not saying others were being intentionally
> > deceitful, but were
> > more
> > > >likely repeating misinformation they heard.  I find this
> > almost as
> > offensive
> > > >as being deceitful. IMO,  it represents intellectual
> > laziness/disinterest
> > > >with  more interest in selling than in selling something
> > appropriate for
> > a
> > > >particular use.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Regards,
> > > >Catherine
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >--
> > > >The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of
> > colloidal silver.
> > > >
> > > >Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at:
> http://silverlist.org
> > >
> > >To post, address your message to: [email protected]
> > >
> > >Silver-list archive:
> http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
> > >
> > >List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >---
> > >Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> > >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > >Version: 6.0.445 / Virus Database: 250 - Release Date: 1/21/03
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> ------
> ----
>
>
> >
> > ---
> > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > Version: 6.0.445 / Virus Database: 250 - Release Date: 1/21/03
> >
>
>