Exactly my point. You can not confirm the data so you really have no information at all. It is not inconceivable that there is a hidden agenda. And puhleeze do not tell me scientists are above that sort of thing cause I know it ain't so and have seen it first hand in the academic setting.
Garnet On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 14:47, somerbus wrote: > > Can you supply links to the raw data on which these percentages are > > based? As a research pharmacologist I am trained to look at the raw data > > and scrutinize the statistics, which can easily be manipulated. > > Er....no, I said it was from a newspaper article. The scientists compared > data from government-backed scientific studies between 1940 and 1991. The > findings confirm an earlier study published in the British Food Journal. The > scientist is David Thomas. > > Yours > Kay Jennings > Bristol > England > mailto:[email protected] > > > -- > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org > > To post, address your message to: [email protected] > > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> > > l
