My opinion is that INFO is used a lot in SIP whatever people like it or not. It should thus be accepted, as well as corrected in its details if some minor aspects need to be enhanced.
The work done in draft-kaplan-sip-info-events goes this direction and should thus become a WG item. Cheers, Xavier On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Dean Willis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We've been batting INFO around for many, many years now (like, 10 -- > it predates the SIP working group). A couple of meetings back, we > agreed that we would discuss use cases for INFO packages, and if we > didn't find any consensus there, then we would go ahead and publish an > "INFO Considered Harmful" RFC. > > We tried having this discussion at the last IETF, but that just didn't > work out. > > Do we try again, or just give up and publish "INFO Considered Harmful"? > > Personally, I don't care anymore -- I just want to drive a stake into > the heart of this undead-thing, cut off its head, stuff the mouth with > holy wafers, and bury it at a crossroads somewhere. > > But this WG only slays by consensus, so what do you want? > > -- > Dean > > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
