> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Cullen Jennings > Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 10:41 AM > > Dean, a room full a 100+ people in the sipping meeting took a hum and > decided much to my surprise to not add an evening meeting.
I wasn't there, but my impression from talking with others was that there was concern over having a late-night meeting given some WG's were going to be meeting early the following morning. > I realize > we wish there was more time but there is not and it is unlikely there > will be more time in Dublin. The best we can do is carefully pick what > topics we do choose to use the time we do have on. I will note there > was not enough interest in this to get an interim meeting to happen. > I would not exactly describe this as AD intervention. I doubt any single topic in the SIP/SIPPING/etc. working groups would by itself be sufficient to warrant an interim meeting, so that's hardly a fair litmus test. Personally I'd prefer an interim meeting specifically to get most of the current mostly-done WG items out of the way and off of the next full-meeting agenda, and just try to get consensus hums for the outcome of the interim at the full-meeting since they're not likely to be contentious; but my guess is you can't do that at an interim? -hadriel _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
