On Jun 23, 2008, at 9:41 AM, Cullen Jennings wrote:
On Jun 21, 2008, at 3:57 PM, Dean Willis wrote:
Cullen Jennings wrote:
Personally, I'd like to see some coherent discussion around it in
a WG meeting then try to get to consensus on it. The totally
number of people bothering to follow the conversation at this
point is extremely low.
We tried to do that in the last meeting, but I seem to remember AD
intervention taking our agenda time away.
Dean, a room full a 100+ people in the sipping meeting took a hum
and decided much to my surprise to not add an evening meeting. I
realize we wish there was more time but there is not and it is
unlikely there will be more time in Dublin. The best we can do is
carefully pick what topics we do choose to use the time we do have
on. I will note there was not enough interest in this to get an
interim meeting to happen. I would not exactly describe this as AD
intervention.
No, I was talking about the 4 hour agenda request that got cut to 2
hours along with the instruction to "focus only on chartered work".
INFO is interesting, but it's not on our milestone list.
--
Dean
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
