On Jun 21, 2008, at 3:57 PM, Dean Willis wrote:
Cullen Jennings wrote:
Personally, I'd like to see some coherent discussion around it in a
WG meeting then try to get to consensus on it. The totally number
of people bothering to follow the conversation at this point is
extremely low.
We tried to do that in the last meeting, but I seem to remember AD
intervention taking our agenda time away.
Dean, a room full a 100+ people in the sipping meeting took a hum and
decided much to my surprise to not add an evening meeting. I realize
we wish there was more time but there is not and it is unlikely there
will be more time in Dublin. The best we can do is carefully pick what
topics we do choose to use the time we do have on. I will note there
was not enough interest in this to get an interim meeting to happen.
I would not exactly describe this as AD intervention.
So it's do it on the list, or don't do it at all, as far as I can
tell.
To be honest, I'd say that we have the people who usually pat
attention to SIP work paying attention now, and the people who
usually don't aren't.
--
dean
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
