On Jul 18, 2008, at 4:03 AM, Elwell, John wrote:
Dean,
So these milestone items we are late on, how many of them are late
because they are held up waiting for face-to-face discussion?
That's a good question. I'm having a hard time telling, since some
(like SAML) don't seem to get a lot of list discussion either.
Let's take a look:
Jun 2007 Mechanism and guidelines for outbound connections to IESG
-- Waiting on me
Jul 2007 Example security flows to WGLC
-- Waiting on author, I think
Jul 2007 Location Conveyance with SIP to IESG
-- Waiting on face-to-face, but in GEOPRIV
Aug 2007 Connection reuse mechanism to IESG
-- Waiting on Keith
Sep 2007 Session Policies to IESG
-- Waiting on Keith
Sep 2007 Example security flows to IESG
-- Waiting on WGLC
Sep 2007 Using SAML for SIP to WGLC
-- Not sure, maybe F2F?
Nov 2007 Requirements for media keying to IESG
-- Waiting on me
Dec 2007 Extensions to SIP UA Profile Delivery Change Notification to
IESG
-- Hey, this one is done! I've just notified the secretariat. Yay!
Dec 2007 Using SAML for SIP to IESG
-- Waiting on the WGLC, which may be waiting on F2F
Dec 2007 Extension for use in etags in conditional notification to IESG
-- Waiting on the author. Somebody buy Aki a beer!
Dec 2007 Delivering request-URI and parameters to UAS via proxy to WGLC
-- DEFINITELY waiting on F2F
Dec 2007 Establishment of secure media sessions using DTLS-SRTP to WGLC
-- Waiting on author. Somebody buy EKR a babysitter!
Feb 2008 Identify requirements for test matrix to move SIP to Draft Std
-- Waiting on F2F. On current agenda.
Feb 2008 Delivering request-URI and parameters to UAS via proxy to IESG
-- Waiting on WGLC, which is waiting on F2F
Feb 2008 Revise charter
-- Waiting on some decisions WRT Identity, which is probably F2F
Feb 2008 Establishment of secure media sessions using DTLS-SRTP to IESG
-- Waiting on WGLC, which is waiting on author
Apr 2008 MIME body handling in SIP to IESG
-- I'm not exactly sure.
Apr 2008 Essential corrections to RFC 3261 (1st batch) to IESG
-- May or may not need F2F for invix
May 2008 Mechanisms for UA initiated privacy to WGLC
-- Waiting for F2F
Jul 2008 Mechanisms for UA initiated privacy to IESG
-- waiting for WGLC, which is waiting F2F
Aug 2008 Guidelines for double route recording to IESG
-- In WGLC from July 16, may or may not need F2F
Sep 2008 X.509 Certificates for TLS use in SIP to IESG
-- Waiting on Keith
Sep 2008 X.509 extended key usage for SIP to IESG
-- Waiting on Keith
Sep 2008 Termination of early dialog prior to final response to WGLC
-- Waiting on F2F
Nov 2008 Termination of early dialog prior to final response to IESG
-- Waiting on WGLC, hence on F2F
So, it looks like we MAY require F2F time to advance the following:
SAML
Record-Route Fix?
invfix (Essential Corrections #1)?
Delivery of URI and Parameters to UAS Through Proxy
Requirements for Test matrix to Move to Draft
Revise Charter
Body Handling?
UA Initiated Privacy
Termination of Early Dialog (which isn't "late" yet)
The three "?" items (Record-Route, invfix, and Body Handling) are all
in a WGLC cycle, so we don't know yet whether we he have critical F2F
issues.
--
Dean
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
