On Jul 18, 2008, at 2:59 PM, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote:
Jul 2007 Location Conveyance with SIP to IESG
-- Waiting on face-to-face, but in GEOPRIV
This one is interesting: I believe that it was not a good idea to have
the document in SIP when most of the controversial discussions
happen in
GEOPRIV, i.e. the encoding wasn't been the problem -- the semantic
was.
Spreading topics over different groups always makes the process more
complicated.
Interesting coincidence with my insanely-cross-posted message of just
now.
Ciao
Hannes
PS: I also have to add that GEOPRIV clearly isn't the easiest group I
have dealt with. Hence, the delay is probably not so surprising.
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
