Dean, So these milestone items we are late on, how many of them are late because they are held up waiting for face-to-face discussion?
John > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Dean Willis > Sent: 18 July 2008 01:40 > To: Jonathan Rosenberg > Cc: SIP IETF; Cullen Jennings > Subject: Re: [Sip] Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72 > > > On Jul 17, 2008, at 3:08 PM, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote: > > > I would also suggest the same list. And in particular, if we don't > > make a lot of progress on INFO and rfc4474, we have wasted > our time. > > Those two IMHO should cover 75% of our meeting time. Having > a bunch > > of 10 minute presentations, each of which is on a topic that only > > three people care about, is not a good use of everyones > time. Those > > two topics clearly have big impact on SIP as a whole and are of > > broad interest. > > I don't disagree. In fact, I think you are absolutely right. > > But while they are within the scope of our charter, neither INFO nor > revision of RFC 4474 is a milestone on our charter. The other things > we currently have on the agenda (except "keep") ARE milestone items. > And we're LATE on most of them! > > So either our charter is wrong, or we're out-of-scope in our > interests. > > I've previously tried to charter deliverables on both items and been > shot down. > > So what do you think we should do? > > -- > Dean > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
