At 02:59 PM 7/18/2008, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote:
>Jul 2007 Location Conveyance with SIP to IESG
> -- Waiting on face-to-face, but in GEOPRIV
This one is interesting: I believe that it was not a good idea to have
the document in SIP when most of the controversial discussions happen in
GEOPRIV, i.e. the encoding wasn't been the problem -- the semantic was.
yeah *but* there is thing about the ID that creates new SIP headers,
and header parameters and a new response code... that makes it be in
SIP, according to an existing RFC (4485 I think)
Spreading topics over different groups always makes the process more
complicated.
Ciao
Hannes
PS: I also have to add that GEOPRIV clearly isn't the easiest group I
have dealt with. Hence, the delay is probably not so surprising.
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
