Paul Mossman wrote: > Carolyn wrote: > ... >>> You will change the Polycom thirdPartyName and type attributes to >>> "hidden"? >>> >> who, me? :-) > > Well, someone. :) >
Someone responsible for Polycom plugin :-) > >> That's up to the config folks. We seem to expose a lot of >> low-level Polycom stuff. We could set the fields based on >> the "shared" setting, but allow them to be over-ridden, or >> make them read-only, or we could hide them. No opinion here. > > Yes, I like the idea of allowing them to be over-ridden in the Polycom. > It's much better to just hide them. Some of the parameters of this sort are available in advanced sections for some plug-ins but I doubt anyone is able to take advantage of that. The specific attributes responsible for shared line functionality should be set based on the generic line/user setting (common for all types of phones). Polycom will be - initially - the only plug-in that understand the generic setting. > > If we do that though let's make it a single "Shared" boolean in the GUI > that controls both the thirdPartyName and type config file attributes. > There won't be any "shared" switch on Polycom specific pages. There will be one on user page. (based on you and Carolyn both agreeing that it's better to configure this on a user level - and not line level). D. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
