Damian wrote: > Paul Mossman wrote: > > Damian wrote: > > ... > >>> If we do that though let's make it a single "Shared" > boolean in the > >>> GUI that controls both the thirdPartyName and type config > >> file attributes. > >> > >> There won't be any "shared" switch on Polycom specific pages. > >> There will be one on user page. (based on you and Carolyn both > >> agreeing that it's better to configure this on a user > level - and not > >> line level). > > > > It would still be useful to override it on the line level. > > > > Consider a Boss and Admin. There is a BossUser with an > appearance on > > both BossOfficePhone and AdminOfficePhone. These two line > appearances > > are shared. > > > > But the Boss also has a BossHomePhone, also with a BossUser line > > appearance. The Boss uses this line in the evening, and > does not want > > it shared with the two office phones. > > > > Sure: but I was not only arguing that we should not expose > low level parameters. I am 100% OK with letting admin to > decide which lines are shared.
OK, I see. Get the feature working first, then add on per-Line control. Ian: The latter step will address our concern. But in both phases, Polycom "thirdPartyName" and "type" are removed line.xml? They instead appear only in the velocity template, with their values generated based on logic that dictates whether or not the line is shared? -Paul [email protected] _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
