On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 09:37 -0400, Beeton, Carolyn (CAR:9D60) wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Lawrence, Scott (BL60:9D30) > > Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 9:02 AM > > To: Maclaren, Ian (CAR:9P10) > > Cc: Beeton, Carolyn (CAR:9D60); Mossman, Paul (CAR:9D30); > > [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [sipX-dev] Config for bridged line appearances > > (XX-4762/XX-5439) > > > > I really think that it would help make this discussion more > > productive if people would drop using the term 'line'. This > > is SIP - there are no 'lines'. There are AOR appearances. > > > > Funny - I see the confusion being about the use of "user", which > sometimes seems to mean a person, and sometimes an AOR.
Agreed. > > Yes, I know that users expect to see 'line' in the UI, and I > > don't object to that, but the discussion above is hard to > > interpret because some uses of 'line' seem to refer to an AOR > > and others refer to an appearance of an AOR on some phone. > > > > On the original question - I rather doubt > > did you mean "think" instead of "rather doubt"? Yes, thank you. > > that doing a first > > cut in which an AOR is either 'shared' at all appearances or > > is not shared on any appearances would work fine. Even if I > > have an appearance on a home phone where having it be > > 'shared' is not required, I rather doubt that it would ever > > actually get in the way - after all, I am physically only > > going to be at one of those phones at a time. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
