On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 23:00 -0400, Ian Maclaren wrote: > I expect the typical scenario is a shared line between users and not > necessarily a sharing of all lines for a given user. > It may be that person A has a line shared with person B, but either, or > both have another unshared line. This should be available. > > This suggests that 1) is the preferred approach. To get around Paul's > concern ideally there's a sipXconfig solution to allow all 'ends' of the > shared line to be defined at the same time. Also this shouldn't be > restricted to just two persons sharing the same line. I'm not sure what > the practial limits may be, but at least three users should be able to > share the same line.
I really think that it would help make this discussion more productive if people would drop using the term 'line'. This is SIP - there are no 'lines'. There are AOR appearances. Yes, I know that users expect to see 'line' in the UI, and I don't object to that, but the discussion above is hard to interpret because some uses of 'line' seem to refer to an AOR and others refer to an appearance of an AOR on some phone. On the original question - I rather doubt that doing a first cut in which an AOR is either 'shared' at all appearances or is not shared on any appearances would work fine. Even if I have an appearance on a home phone where having it be 'shared' is not required, I rather doubt that it would ever actually get in the way - after all, I am physically only going to be at one of those phones at a time. _______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
