Paul Mossman wrote:
> Damian wrote:
> ... 
>>> If we do that though let's make it a single "Shared" boolean in the 
>>> GUI that controls both the thirdPartyName and type config 
>> file attributes.
>>
>> There won't be any "shared" switch on Polycom specific pages. 
>> There will be one on user page. (based on you and Carolyn 
>> both agreeing that it's better to configure this on a user 
>> level - and not line level).
> 
> It would still be useful to override it on the line level.
> 
> Consider a Boss and Admin.  There is a BossUser with an appearance on
> both BossOfficePhone and AdminOfficePhone.  These two line appearances
> are shared.
> 
> But the Boss also has a BossHomePhone, also with a BossUser line
> appearance.  The Boss uses this line in the evening, and does not want
> it shared with the two office phones.
> 

Sure: but I was not only arguing that we should not expose low level
parameters. I am 100% OK with letting admin to decide which lines are shared.
Damian

_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-dev
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to