On Feb 14, 2010, at 4:05 PM, M. Ranganathan wrote: >> The cSeq number of the BYE is wrong. In the trace you posted it is >> 658568416 >> The INVITE is 1 >> The BYE must have a CSeq number of 2. Hence it is invalid and has been >> rejected. [...] > Perhaps you can report the problem to the ITSP.
Ranga, Thank you. Could you please clarify a doubt for me? In my trace, the CSeq of the BYE from the ITSP = CSeq of the ITSP's original INVITE + 1. You are saying that it should instead be sipxbridge's re-INVITE CSeq + 1. I looked at page 61 "Session with re-INVITE" of RFC3665 at http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3665.txt. Can you check the CSeq of F1 (original INVITE), F9 (re-invite), and F12(BYE) in that example? Isn't that what my ITSP is doing wrt CSeq? Thanks _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
