On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 00:16 -0800, Pizza Napoletana wrote:
> On Feb 14, 2010, at 4:05 PM, M. Ranganathan wrote:
> >> The cSeq number of the BYE is wrong. In the trace you posted it is
> >> 658568416
> >> The INVITE is 1
> >> The BYE must have a CSeq number of 2. Hence it is invalid and has been 
> >> rejected.
> [...]
> > Perhaps you can report the problem to the ITSP.
> 
> Ranga,
> Thank you. Could you please clarify a doubt for me?
> 
> In my trace, the CSeq of the BYE from the ITSP = CSeq of the ITSP's original 
> INVITE + 1.
> You are saying that it should instead be sipxbridge's re-INVITE CSeq + 1.

You're right - the CSeq on the BYE is ok.


I think the real problem is the phone that is answering the transferred
call.

At frame 104, the bridge gets a 200 from the transfer target leg, but
there's no SDP in it - that's not legal, since the INVITE (frame 70) did
have SDP.  At that point, the bridge starts an MoH dialog - I think it's
confused by the lack of SDP.  By the time the outside call hangs up,
things are already messed up.



_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to