Despite what others said, I had no problems transferring out of the old ACD either. We had a help desk that handled 110 medical facilities and handled thousands of calls. We didn't have any reliability problems. There were some minor options that weren't there, and it got completely destroyed (paid ticket with ezuce could not resolve) on a 4.0.4 to 4.2.1 upgrade to the point where I had to rebuild the server. Other than that, I did not have any reliability issues with it.

On 8/29/2012 7:29 AM, Matt White wrote:
I've often heard it cited that the old ACD cant transfer out of the queue. I think this is based on very old info....pre 4.2 days. We have no less than hundreds of calls (if not thousands) across several customers sites sending calls into queues and back out to non ACD extensions. ACD has preformed very well for us and is very stable (i cant think of one ACD related crash/issue). When it comes to transferring out of the queue, I'd say our heaviest call center customer that has 23 agents and processes no less than 800 calls a day will transfer 50% of the calls from and agent out of the queue to a regular extension. They even transfer ACD calls back out to external numbers (hairpins).

In fact, we have a customer that has some pretty complex call flow in and out of the ACD. Calls come into the queue. If its not answered it overflows out to an AA where they get custom options to keep holding etc. they then get transferred back into a second ACD queue. This happens multiple times. Siptraces are quite long because each call stays anchored in the queue which is great for reporting.

Hunt groups do not provide was call centers want. Call center managers need to run reports based on when an agent signed in/out; how long did they talk; how long did they ring; how long are customers waiting in queues and how many customers are stacking up in queues....

The distinctive tone as noted in this original thread and modified caller id are also part of that need.

Hunt groups just dont preform these functions (if they did, they would be an ACD and not a hunt group).

So for us, the bulk of our installations are call centers. As VOIP/SIP becomes more common place its increasingly difficult to sell something that just does call routing and voicemail...there is just so many cheap and hosted solutions if thats all you need. Which is why are installations for the last few years have moved up the stack to customers that have more specialized needs.

So for us, our dilemma is get sipXacd maintained internally (we have an elance dev working on that now), or look for a new platform.

-M

>>> Michael Picher <[email protected]> 08/29/12 6:53 AM >>>
The problem with the old ACD, every time I tried to use it, was that it was fragile. Do this, don't ever do that, etc... Any time I tried to use it in a situation the customer (and then ultimately me) had a bad experience.

If they can make it stable, and make it so you can transfer calls out of queue that would be awesome.

Most people don't need a real ACD (even though they think they want an ACD). What they need are fancy hunt groups which is exactly what the 4.4 ACD does.

Work has begun on a new hunt group app that will hopefully alleviate the need for an ACD in cases where it really isn't needed. This will be based around some new code and involve a B2BUA that can 'own' the call and then hunt out. This will be in contrast to how hunt groups work now where it's a SIP messaging nightmare.

Circular hunt groups, linear hunt groups, being able to ring the same extension at more than one point in a hunt group are all envisioned. At some point I'd even like to see users be able to (from a phone or user portal) login/out of hunt groups, or only ring certain users for different days/hours in a hunt group.

With the current workload I wouldn't expect anything until 4.8 though.

Thanks,
  Mike

On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:21 AM, Matt White <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Funny, the beep is one reason my customers wont move to openACD.
    OpenACD for my customers that need a true ACD.  The old ACD worked
    well despite its bad rap.

    We have a developer working on get sipXacd ported over to 4.6 so
    there is hope yet.

    As to your specific issue, I don't think the tone is an audio
    file, so you would need to create a patch to remove it.

    -m



    >>> Ali Dashti <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> 08/28/12 9:14 AM >>>

    Thanks Tony, one thing that made me go back to 4.4 ACD was the
    CallerID and DNID! In 4.4 ACD when a call arrives; an agent would
    see a Queue name and the Line extention in CallerID but in OpenACD
    even the DNID changes to agent extension number; therefore
    prevents me from knowing what number was dialed!! This was my
    primary result, do you see this as well?

    On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Tony Graziano
    <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        fyi - If you are referring to the existing ACD (not openacd) I
        don't think any resources are going into it as it is being
        removed in favor of the openacd integration starting up in 4.6.

        On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Ali Dashti
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            This could be a very old issue! I was wondering if there
            is a way to remove thebeep heard a short moment after an
            agent picks up a call on ACD!! Thanks.

            _______________________________________________
            sipx-users mailing list
            [email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>
            List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/




-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        Tony Graziano, Manager
        Telephone: 434.984.8430 <tel:434.984.8430>
        sip: [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        Fax: 434.465.6833 <tel:434.465.6833>
        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        Linked-In Profile:
        http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4
        Ask about our Internet Fax services!
        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

        Using or developing for sipXecs from SIPFoundry? Ask me about
        sipX-CoLab 2013!
        <http://sipxcolab2013.eventbrite.com/?discount=tony2013>


        LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
        Telephone: 434.984.8426 <tel:434.984.8426>
        sip: [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>

        Helpdesk Customers: http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net
        Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net

        _______________________________________________
        sipx-users mailing list
        [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/



    _______________________________________________
    sipx-users mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/




--
Michael Picher, Director of Technical Services
eZuce, Inc.

300 Brickstone Square

Suite 201

Andover, MA. 01810

O.978-296-1005 X2015 <tel:978-296-1005%20X2015>
M.207-956-0262 <tel:207-956-0262>
@mpicher <http://twitter.com/mpicher>
linkedin <http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=35504760&trk=tab_pro>
www.ezuce.com <http://www.ezuce.com>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are 10 kinds of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.



_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Reply via email to