<quote who="Sridhar Dhanapalan"> > How does Ubuntu Server + Desktop Packages differ from the Desktop Version > itself? Is there a page somewhere that describes this? I'm sure that there > is more than one person who has been bitten in the bum in regards to this.
The 'server' install (from the alternate or server CDs) just installs the ubuntu-standard metapackage and all of its dependencies. The 'desktop' install (from the alternate or desktop CDs) installs the ubuntu-desktop metapackage and all of its dependencies (including ubuntu-standard). There should be very little, if any, difference between doing the full desktop install straight up vs. doing a 'server' install and installing the ubuntu desktop metapackage. > I hate to burst your bubble, but CC does not meet the free software > guidelines: http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.html > > The main problem is the "Attribution" clause, which is not supported by > the Free Software Definition since it imposes a restriction. IIRC, the > original BSD Licence had a similar problem. (James' mistake is that he didn't specify which CC license. He could have chosen one which did not require attribution.) - Jeff -- linux.conf.au 2007: Sydney, Australia http://lca2007.linux.org.au/ Penguinillas Pack GNUzis -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html
