bmp?! Now you're talking fancy... XPM files all the way!
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Raffaele Fragapane < [email protected]> wrote: > Totally, why on earth would anyone ever want some functionality or > versatility?! Down with it! Bring MS' bmp back, I say. > > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 1:29 PM, Gene Crucean < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> That's *exactly *why I hate them. Wayyyy too many flavors and options >> for people to f**k up. Yes they support a lot of features... but I almost >> never want any of them, and I don't want texture guys saving them with >> layers using lzw compression in cmyk ;) >> >> Seriously. They suck :P >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Steven Caron <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> tifs are perfectly fine... they support many bit depths, mip mapping, >>> and tiling. i did a comparison to exr as a texture format years ago and >>> OIIO/Arnold liked the tif files better. >>> >>> s >>> >>
