wait.. shawn hendricks is a celebrity..? what movie has he been in?  sorry
, never herad of him.

:)

On 28 February 2013 20:50, Mirko Jankovic <[email protected]> wrote:

> looks like marketing mistake is that people AD is talking to are not
> standard product buying target audience and using "let's build interest and
> give piece by piece" marketing strategy really seems wrong :)
> it more looks like scam:"see we have this nice goodies here, and a lot
> more if you buy now!"
>
> as I see it, AD is selling to people that really know exactly what they
> need, and nicely design package and famous people telling them why to buy
> this piece of software is completely wrong approach. Instead more clear and
> straight forward approach would probably be way more appreciated.
> After all decisions to buy next batch of licences are rarely made based on
> sneak peak and stuff but more on hard facts.
> If you provide all tech details that are needed for making such decision..
> all future planing is easier as well.
> Right now it is really dark ahead and anyone thinking what to purchase
> next is really left alone with hardly any useful information.
>
> example:
> Ok 2014 Softimage will be release <enter date>
> - What is fixed
> - What is new
> - Price changes if any
>
> Those details are probably only one that interest people.
> Hardly anyone care if some celebrity start clicking on sponge bob view
> cube:"uuuu what does this button do!" :)
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 8:41 PM, olivier jeannel 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>  Agree, if the asian market is what is keeping SI development alive,
>> then I happily go for it !
>>
>>
>> Le 28/02/2013 20:23, Eric Thivierge a écrit :
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Mirko Jankovic <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I don't recall a single sequencer wish
>>
>>
>> True but from what I've heard the Euro / North American users aren't the
>> only ones asking for features and we might not see the requests from the
>> Asian users.
>>
>> --------------------------------------------
>> Eric Thivierge
>> http://www.ethivierge.com
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to