Just imagine the complexity of custom parameters one has to deal when you have multiple passes and ice parameters to override...
On 27 Mar, 2013, at 9:25 PM, "Felix Geremus" <felixgere...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I was about to say that it can be done without custom parameters, see > attached screenshot. But then I discovered that this doesn't work when there > are more than one node of the same type in the tree. So yeah, kind of useful > I guess... > > > On 27.03.2013 14:10, Chris Chia wrote: >> It makes it so much easier to override parameters without going thru the >> hard way with the custom parameters... And it makes it easy to track what >> parameters have been overridden with the visual aids in the ice tree... >> >> >> On 27 Mar, 2013, at 9:07 PM, "Rob Chapman" >> <tekano....@gmail.com<mailto:tekano....@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> yes, I thought that too, we are allowed to talk about this now right? the >> NDA is over? >> >> but a big EG is you could vary the number of particles in different passes. >> personally, for this I have different point clouds per pass but hey, a >> feature is a feature... :) >> >> >> >> On 27 March 2013 13:58, Felix Geremus >> <felixgere...@googlemail.com<mailto:felixgere...@googlemail.com>> wrote: >> Soooo, can somebody enlighten me what's so great about ICE overrides (one of >> our 4 amazing new features)? I just watched the video and all that can be >> done since forever by overriding the values of low level nodes instead of >> exposed compound parameters? Or am I missing something? >> >> Felix >> > > <scalar_override.jpg>
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
