On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Greg Punchatz <[email protected]> wrote: > I thought the hair stuff looked very very nice... but the tree demo was > simply sad. It SEEMED much slower than ICE for only a few low poly trees, > and like you said I would expect it to very fast and scalable. The video > makes it seem like just the opposite. It seems with Arnold standins I can > handle much larger data sets in ISC...based on the demo video.
You mean it's slow orbiting and panning the viewport? XGen is not doing anything afaik during these operation. the slowness must be a combination of all the shadows and effects of the viewport 2.0 setup he's using combined with the camtesia capture > Is there a way to get this data into soft? I could see using the hair tools > as my first step into the dark side ;). Could I write out Arnold .ass files? > > Thanks > G
