Considering past practice and general disdain for clients, i can see that statement about extra bits charging a little bit more for, turning into a dlc type war of content ransoming...
On 15 August 2014 22:43, Jason S <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 08/15/14 14:09, Eric Thivierge wrote: > > Is this the new philosophy for all of Maya because it's generally the case > application wide... > > I hardly believe the philosophy of the company has (ever) changed. > Still salivating on the idea of being the only company in town and > actually succeding at that (through overtakes as opposed to through > innovation) while some people cheer. > > So the most abusive/lucrative policies (if anyone thinks its bad now) > could be put in place, > and people could bitch all they want while shelling-out the extra doe > needed to cover the (revised) fees, > or for the (essential) extras on the Store (with 'convenient' pay-per-use > options), > or the new increases required to access our own stuff on the 'secure' > (controlled) cloud. > > Oh but they wouldn't hold people's assets (or asses) as collateral (now > would they) > > Hey Phil? did you eventually succeed in opening your old scene? > > >
