On 3/31/12 4:56 PM, Rémi Després wrote:
Alain,
You had initially announced that either one specification would be
chosen for standard track (among T, E, and U), or specifications
would all become WG drafts on the experimental track ((*) below). In
Paris: (a)The MAP proposal became presented as an inseparable T+E
package. (b) The WG couldn't make a consensus choice between T+E or
U.
Now publishing both MAP-T+E and 4rd-U as WG documents on the
experimental track, is therefore consistent with what was announced
(and was also asked for by several at the end of the meeting). As you
explained, this won't prevent from selecting one for standard track
later on, based on better market experience.
Not sure that was the outcome - as I understood Alain, we'll make a
decision here on mailinglist in a very short period of time.
Cheers, Jan
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
