On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Stig Venaas <s...@venaas.com> wrote: > On 6/8/2012 8:34 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: >> >> Hi Med, >> >> I agree with Woj. >> >> I do not favor moving this draft to somewhere else. >> >> Instead this draft should be revised to make it >> Multicast extensions to DS-Lite as in the charter. >> >> There is enough time to do it. > > > As this draft shows though, one can provide multicast in a DS-Lite > environment in an entirely generic way. I think that is great. It's > much better to have a general solution. > > But this means the draft should be modified to reflect that. It is > great to have a draft describing this.
A "general" solution using translation won't simply cut it for DS-Lite which is a tunneling protocol. No matter how hard you try. Behcet _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
