Hi Behcet, I failed to understand the point you are trying to make.
The current situations is: * this document provides multicast extension to deliver multicast to DS-Lite serviced customers * we rely on multicast capabilities, as such no AMT-like considerations are included * the proposed solution is generic and can be deployed in any 4-6-4 use case What should be revised? Thanks for your help. Cheers, Med >-----Message d'origine----- >De : Behcet Sarikaya [mailto:sarikaya2...@gmail.com] >Envoyé : vendredi 8 juin 2012 17:35 >À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/NAD/TIP >Cc : Wojciech Dec; Stig Venaas; softwires@ietf.org; Yong Cui >Objet : Re: [Softwires] WG last call on >draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-02 > >Hi Med, > >I agree with Woj. > >I do not favor moving this draft to somewhere else. > >Instead this draft should be revised to make it >Multicast extensions to DS-Lite as in the charter. > >There is enough time to do it. > >Regards, > >Behcet > >On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:43 AM, <mohamed.boucad...@orange.com> wrote: >> Hi Woj, >> >> Your comment is valid. >> >> The point I wanted to make is to recall the initial >motivation of this >> draft: solve an issue raised by DS-Lite people. >> >> Evidently, the proposed approach can be deployed in any >4-6-4 scenario. This >> will be reflected in the updated version of the draft. >> >> Cheers, >> Med >> >> ________________________________ >> De : Wojciech Dec [mailto:wdec.i...@gmail.com] >> Envoyé : vendredi 8 juin 2012 09:57 >> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/NAD/TIP >> Cc : sarik...@ieee.org; Stig Venaas; softwires@ietf.org; Yong Cui >> >> Objet : Re: [Softwires] WG last call on >> draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-02 >> >> Hello Med, >> >> there is no dependency here on ds-lite, ie This has all the >hallmarks of a >> standalone solution, which will almost certainly be >implemented as such, and >> one that will work with or without ds-lite for unicast. >> >> Regards, >> Woj. >> >> On 8 June 2012 07:48, <mohamed.boucad...@orange.com> wrote: >>> >>> Re-, >>> >>> May I re-iterate: >>> >>> * The draft is designed to allow the delivery of multicast >services to >>> DS-Lite serviced customers. >>> * The draft proposes multicast extensions and not unicast ones. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Med >>> >>> >-----Message d'origine----- >>> >De : Behcet Sarikaya [mailto:sarikaya2...@gmail.com] >>> >Envoyé : jeudi 7 juin 2012 20:20 >>> >À : Stig Venaas >>> >Cc : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/NAD/TIP; softwires@ietf.org; Yong Cui >>> >Objet : Re: [Softwires] WG last call on >>> >draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast-02 >>> > >>> >On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Stig Venaas ><s...@venaas.com> wrote: >>> >> On 6/7/2012 10:08 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:07 >>> >AM,<mohamed.boucad...@orange.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>> > >>> >>> So you are saying that this draft does not correspond to >>> >>> Multicast extensions for DS-Lite? >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> I sent a separate review, but anyway, it is not an extension to >>> >> DS-Lite as I see it. It is a completely generic approach for >>> >> tunneling v6 through v4. It can certainly be deployed in DS-Lite >>> >> scenarios, but it is much more generic. I would like the >title and >>> >> the text to reflect that. >>> > >>> >So it means that this draft does not correspond to Softwire charter >>> >item and we discover this quite late in the process. >>> > >>> >My recommendation to the chairs is to read and double >check the draft >>> >before making an adoption call, especially if there is choice. >>> > >>> >As I mentioned in my mboned mail, in multicast transition >I think the >>> >right approach is to agree to the fact that most of the host's >>> >communication will be unicast. For unicast, v4-v6 transition has >>> >already been well analyzed and several protocols have been >specified. >>> >Multicast extensions to those protocols are what we need. >>> > >>> >Regards, >>> > >>> >Behcet >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Softwires mailing list >>> Softwires@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires >> >> > _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
